User talk:Verticalanswer

This is verticalanswer's talkpage.

Notability
I'm really sorry but you need to read Notability and Reliable sources. Conflict of interest as well. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 15:21, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Erik Bowman
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Erik Bowman, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.spoink.com/founder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Erik Bowman
A tag has been placed on Erik Bowman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ttonyb (talk) 19:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Guanzi Institute
A tag has been placed on Guanzi Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 19:46, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Erik N Bowman
Hello Verticalanswer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Erik N Bowman for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  Ish dar  ian  00:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I deleted it; it is an advertisement for his books, and he is not remotely notable--all the books are self published, only 1 is in worldcat, and that one present in only two libraries.We do not regard self published books as even an indication of possible importance.

Unless you have much bette references for notability, references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, there is no point in trying to write an article.. You have now tried to insert it twice, once with the middle initial, once without. This is not good-faith editing, but promotionalism. The necessary formal warning follows.  DGG ( talk ) 02:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Heidi Butzine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heidi Butzine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Heidi Butzine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  DGG ( talk ) 04:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)