User talk:Vervadr

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Barry m (talk) 20:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Welcome
Hey, Your recent edit has been reverted because it was what we call a "Test Edit" and it didn't really contribute to the article as it was. Please have a look at MOS:LINK for more information on how to make add links to pages (<--- Like that one) and where to put them. Thanks, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Adam McCormick (talk) 22:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Vervadr. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. βcommand 17:24, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

If you're interested in combatting Vandalism...
...consider adding the Twinkle scripts to your repertoire. You might also consider adding yourself to the Counter-Vandalism Unit. Happy wiki'ing! xenocidic (talk) 03:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * By the way, publishing your email address on your user page is probably not the best idea, as you will greatly increase the amount of spam sent to you. If users are going to give you advice, they'll likely do it here, on your talk page. =) xenocidic (talk) 03:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Move problems with Honeypot ant
Hiya!

I just finished cleaning up a bit of mistaken move mess. Don't worry about it too much, but in the future you may wish to simply make a redirect to the original article instead of moving it. I'm not sure what the Honey nt article was (just a typo during the move?) but as moves are difficult to clean up at times, I'd suggest it be one location where Being Bold should take a back seat to caution. :D

Better luck next time! 19:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

WP AH
Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 16:44, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Little context in Bardan Jusik
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bardan Jusik, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bardan Jusik is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bardan Jusik, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:10, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Livia Bitton-Jackson
A tag has been placed on Livia Bitton-Jackson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Macromonkey (talk) 20:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi - look I'm sorry I deleted your article, but in this case it is better to speak to the deleting admin (me) than the person who tagged it for deletion. I'll be happy to help you. Pedro : Chat  22:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

I flagged the article because it presented little facts etc, and the article did not put the woman across as notable. Don't tell me that my edits etc are screwed up, it is an impolite statement to make about somebody patrolling new pages to remove vandalism and useless articles. Your article fell into the latter category, as it gave little information. If the article is re-created effectively, then rest assured, it won't be nominated (by me at least) again. Macromonkey (talk) 11:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

And don't warn me for making my contribution to wikipedia. If you are, however, rude to me in future, I will have no choice but to report you Macromonkey (talk) 11:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Livia Bitton-Jackson
A tag has been placed on Livia Bitton-Jackson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --EEMIV (talk) 15:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey, no problem! It makes a change to have somebody apologise for something on here, so thanks :) Macromonkey (talk) 19:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm removing your hangon tag from this article. I removed the speedy tag myself. There is enough support for the article that, if deletion will happen, it will happen through the WP:AFD process, but even then I wouldn't worry. The subject is definitely notable. Vulture19 (talk) 19:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Nice article on Livia Bitton-Jackson - hope you will expand on it!!
Guess the subject line says it all - hope you can dig up a bunch more goodies on this fascinating lady soon!!

Cheers, MayFlowerNorth MayFlowerNorth (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added on 19:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC).