User talk:Veryhappybubbles!/Agricultural chemistry/Movingqlong Peer Review

Response to peer review
Hi Movingqlong,

Thank you for all your feedback! I tried my best to fix my lead section- hopefully now it's more organized. I also reorganized a large chunk of the article and renamed "sciences" to "advantages and disadvantages" and moved a lot of the content around. I also tried to delete stuff in the lead that wasn't relevant to the rest of the article, and add stuff that was. I did my best to fix all the important parts that you bolded- you found a mistake in my citations which I appreciate and I fixed it. I also fixed most of your grammar/ brogan suggestions. I must admit that deleting the history section was unintentional, but seeing as quite a few of the citations are broken in that section and you also suggested that it doesn't add very much to the article, I kept it as deleted. As for including other sections on animal feed supplements/ sustainability etc, while I'm sure they would improve the article, there are so many aspects to agricultural chemistry that I decided to just focus on 3 that I found most important. I did, however, try to move/ add things around to provide a bit more detail and clarity. I also added an image!

Thank you so much for your feedback, I really appreciate it!

- Veryhappybubbles! Veryhappybubbles! (talk) 01:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)