User talk:Vesper85

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hervé Jaubert, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. The Master of Mayhem 17:37, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hervé Jaubert. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. The Master of Mayhem 17:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hervé Jaubert, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. The Master of Mayhem 17:50, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hervé Jaubert, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. The Master of Mayhem 17:53, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! Although one of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view, we would like to remind you not to undo other people's edits, without explaining why in an edit summary. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Thank you.  Golgofrinchian  (talk)  21:46, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued removal of material, as you did at Hervé Jaubert. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:49, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

The Wikipedia page in reference to my name: Herve Jaubert, is being maliciously edited with defamatory material and baseless accusations to smear my name and slander my person. I am trying to revert these editings and re establish the truth and facts. I want also to complain about the person who is relentlessly editing my page with defamatory materials. Look at the edits by Astair85, Funandtrvl, Hon-3s-T, Golgofrinchian, Wikipelli, the master of mayhem, they are all the same negative edits by the same person using different IP addresses. I am the victim of vandalism, and not the other way around , it is my name, my reputation here. I am Herve Jaubert Best regards Herve Jaubert


 * Ideally you should not be editing an article about yourself. You are allowed to remove incorrect unreferenced data, so long as you explain why - seeWP:BLPEDIT. However most of the removals did have references. As far as I can see you have made no explanation of those wild deletions until this point in time.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

I edited deleted information that is false. I would be morethan happy to send you documents and evidence to support my reasonsfor editing. I don' t claim to be a former covert operative of the DGSE, I was, and it is documented. I did not flee from France in 2001, I moved to the US in 1996. I do not have any criminal records in France, no convictions, no arrests whatsoever. Dont you think it is up to the person who is editing my page with false accusations to prove them, instead of me proving that they are false. My company in forida did not experience large losses at all. I forgot to renew my registration. I never proposed to move my operation to Dubai, It is Sultan Bin Sulayem who invited me to move to Dubai. I was authorized in 2004 to move to Dubai with my sport rifle. How come almost3 years later it became illegal. Again it was documented in federal court. I was charge and convicted in 2008 for this, only because Dubai needed to frame me. I did record the police interrogation during which i was threatened to be tortured, only i left the recording behind during my escape. I made a reenactment back in the US to support the publishing of my book and the production of a movie, reporters were aware it was a reenactment and that the original had been left in Dubai. My Book, "escape from dubai" has not been discredited at all in court, at the contrary, it has been authentificated, all this is a maneuver to prevent me from producing a movie on my story. Dubai World lost all counts against me in federal court, the same accusations against me in Dubai. That make my dubai conviction a wrongfull conviction. Dubai World won a summary judgment against Seahorse Submarines, not against me, for breach of contract, Seahorse is a defunct company since2006, Dubai World was aware of that. I have never been convicted in France. I am listed at interpol, but following my acquital in federal court, i already filed a request to remove the red notice, because it is based on a wrongful conviction in dubai, Dubai misuses interpol to affect people lives. Astair removed links that are true facts but negative to Dubai World, these links should be posted, and did try that repeadedly http://www.cbs12.com/news/wellington-4731372-legal-won.html http://sofloreporter.wordpress.com/ I hope i convinced you that the edits by astair85 are biased, and defamatory. He is using nothing but press articles, press articles are NOT justice records. If it was don t you think these records would have been produced in federal court, Dubai World had nothing against me in court, so now they are trying on Wikipedia, and using wikipedia to prevent me from running a business, establis business relations and making money, all that by spreading false news to scare business partners. Why is that Astair85 voluntarily omits to mention that Dubai World lost all their 5 claims against me in the federal court, it is a fact, they lost, it is public records. I am just trying to remove these false facts, and post the ones that are true, he is the one who vandalised Wikipedia. I d rather have my page deleted if i cannot edit it and remove this slander