User talk:Veverve/Archive 1

Discretionary Sanctions Notification - Eastern Europe
Due solely to the volume of content you've added to Moscow–Constantinople schism (2018) I'm informing you of these rules; I haven't reviewed your edits on that page. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 02:25, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Logo of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Granting of autocephaly.
Since you have breached WP:3RR, I suggest that you set out your case in the talk page. I opened a new topic at 2RR.Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:23, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas
Today is Christ’s birthday (according to the Julian calendar)! May God bless you and your family on this joyous day!--Nicoljaus (talk) 12:08, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your kind words! Merry Christmas to you too! I hope you will have a good year and that fortune will be clement with you. Veverve (talk) 17:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, I can only repeat last year’s wishes!--Nicoljaus (talk) 01:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Well, like last year, thanks a lot! Veverve (talk) 09:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * (I now see in December that I completly forgot to ping you back in January) Thanks a lot! I did not expect to get it for this article, given that it is Autocephaly of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine which made it Template:In the news recently. Thanks again! Veverve (talk) 17:43, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Religion in Ukraine
Hi, if you have time, can you check recent edits to the above article. I don't know much about the subject. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 16:13, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. Feel free to ask me if you need another check. Veverve (talk) 17:37, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Patriarchal Exarchate in South-East Asia
Please, don't do such reverts. Archdiocese of Russian Orthodox churches in Western Europe has never had parishes in South-East Asia. By the way his surname in Chashin (Чашин), but not Chasin (Часин). ~ Чръный человек (talk) 13:54, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello.
 * First, the background is a recap of the situation. I agree the AROCWE never had churches in SE Asia, but it still happened shortly before the PESEA was created and I thought it was a good idea to talk about it. Moreover, the background you put before to replace mine had no reference whatsoever. I agree that the current "Background" section fits the article better (especially since you put references this time).
 * Second, the title of primacy of the primate of the Patriarchal Exarchate in South-East Asia is "Archbishop of Singapore and South-East Asia",(https://mospat.ru/en/2018/12/28/news168464/) it is not "Metropolitan of Singapore and South-East Asia". That Sergius was elevated to a the rank of Metropolitan does not change that the title of the primate (i.e. regardless if it is Sergius) is "Archbishop of Singapore and South-East Asia" Veverve (talk) 14:58, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The fact is that for a long time the Russian Orthodox Church did not create any structures on the territory of South-East Asia. This was done in order not to aggravate relations with the "Ecumenical" Patriarchate of Constantinople, which claims control over the entire Orthodox Diaspora. However, after the latter's invasion of Ukraine, Russian Orthodox Church broke of Eucharistic communication with Constantinople, and decided that it is free from any previous agreements with Constantinople. For this reason, 2 patriarchal exarchates were created now, but not earlier. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 15:59, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * On 26 Feburary 2019 the Internal regulation of the Patriarchal Exarchate of South-East Asia was adopted: "The supreme ecclesiastical authority in the Exarchate belongs to the Synod of the Patriarchal Exarchate in Southeast Asia (hereinafter referred to as the “Synod of the Exarchate”), headed by the Metropolitan of Singapore and Southeast Asia, the Patriarchal Exarch of South-East Asia (hereinafter “Exarch”), and consisting of diocesan bishops of the dioceses of the Exarchate. The vicar bishop of the Diocese of the Exarchate may, at the invitation of the Exarch, participate in the meeting of the Synod with the right of an advisory vote" (original, translation). ~ Чръный человек (talk) 16:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * You are right, I will change what has to be changed. Veverve (talk) 16:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. Thanks for your great help! Veverve (talk) 17:19, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Maybe it will be useful for you: "Мы всегда с уважением относились к Константинопольскому патриархату и закрывали глаза на его претензии на попечение над всеми православными диаспорами, - сказал отец Александр. - Но теперь этот подход имеет мало общего с действительностью, уже нет никаких оснований Константинопольскому патриархату считать себя правомочным брать под свое духовное покровительство вообще всю диаспору, как в Западной Европе, так и в других частях мира. Теперь приняты новые решения о том, как будет окормляться русскоязычная паства и те люди, которые относят себя к членам Русской православной церкви. Церковная жизнь для русских общин в Западной Европе теперь будет развиваться по другому руслу." (We have always respected the Patriarchate of Constantinople and turned a blind eye to its claims to the custody of all Orthodox diasporas, " father Alexander said. "- But now this approach has little in common with reality, there is no reason for the Patriarchate of Constantinople to consider itself competent to take under its spiritual protection the entire Diaspora, both in Western Europe and in other parts of the world. Now new decisions have been made on how the Russian-speaking flock and those people who consider themselves members of the Russian Orthodox Church will be pastoraly cared. Church life for Russian communities in Western Europe will now develop in a different direction.) ~ Чръный человек (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I have now added a small section about this in the articles of the PESEA, the DROCSP and the PEWE. Veverve (talk) 11:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Plese improve my articles
Eugene (Reshetnikov) and Elisey (Ganaba) ~ Чръный человек (talk) 12:30, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Done! Next, could you translate those articles: 1, 2, 3? Veverve (talk) 14:46, 30 April 2019 (UTC)


 * "Bishop of Bogorodsk, the vicar of the Diocese of Chersonesus" those are not the same offices, was he appointed at both? Vicar of the Diocese of Chersonesus is office; Bishop of Bogorodsk is title. Vicar Bishop must have a title. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 20:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

See Patriarchal parishes in Italy, Diocese of Singapore (Russian Orthodox Church) and Diocese of Thailand. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 08:36, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:Honorary citizens of Seoul has been nominated for discussion
Category:Honorary citizens of Seoul, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor(talk) 05:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:Koukoulion has been nominated for discussion
Category:Koukoulion, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 06:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Gregory (Korobeynikov)
Hello Veverve, per our last discussion, here is the lattest article I've been working on which involves the Orthodox Church in Russia, which you can find at User:Inter&anthro/Gregory (Korobeynikov). Before moving it to the main space I wanted to make sure that the information in the article is complete and up-to-date as you had told me. From what I can tell the Old Beliver Orthodox Church has a simplier organization than the Russian Orthodox Church, so the article might be easier to review and add to. Thank you Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 18:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * my corrections are done. Next time, please include a link to the original Russian article in your message. Veverve (talk) 18:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Grammar
Dear Veverve, sorry to bother you with this, but this appears to be a recurring problem as evidenced by my most recent edits. I wonder what your mother tongue is, though it is none of my business, strictly speaking. The actual problem is that the way you edit often defies the rules of the English language. Apart from that, we are not here to chronicle each statement by this or that official, etc. This is an encyclopedia that seeks to explain things (events) that are of enduring notability in a way that makes sense and is comprehensible to a layperson; ″Wikipedia is also not written in news style". Regards, Axxxion (talk) 15:47, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Siluyan (Kilin) & Eumenius (Mikheyev)
As with last time the drafts I've been working on can be found here and here. The Russian language articles can be found at and. Thank you for your work, feel free to look over the two drafts at your own pace and add what ever I missed from the Russian language counter parts. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 22:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I am working on it! Do not forget to put a Template:Translated page on the talk page of the article when your article is a translation. Veverve (talk) 17:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Have you finished editing the drafts? I noticed you haven't edited them much in the past few days. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah, sorry! I had kind of forgotten about those pages as I have been busy lately on Wikipedia and various sister projects. I will finish your pages during this week-end. By the way, do you use WP:CXT (cf. WP:HOWTRANS)? Veverve (talk) 01:05, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * No I haven't heard of it yet, but I will look into it, thanks for letting me know. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 02:03, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Draft:Siluyan (Kilin): done. I have to congratulate you since your article is more complete and referenced that the Russian one.
 * Draft:Eumenius (Mikheyev): done. Veverve (talk) 21:50, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Do not forget to add the version= for Template:Translated page. Veverve (talk) 22:54, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * also, try to remember to put a WP:SHORTDESC with Template:Short description whenever you create an article. Veverve (talk) 02:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * also, try to remember to put a WP:SHORTDESC with Template:Short description whenever you create an article. Veverve (talk) 02:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

"Opinion of the Catholic Church on the Vulgate"
I still continue to think that this section should be shortened and renamed into something like "Opinion of the Catholic Church on the Vulgate"


 * There has been a lot of too and fro here, but so far editor Calicem has been unable to substantiate his speculations from any notable recent scholarship


 * So I am inclined to propose scrubbing the section on the Inerrancy of the Vulgate; and replacing it as you suggested. TomHennell (talk) 12:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, I agree with your agreement. Veverve (talk) 12:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

talk page
Please discuss rather than reverting, at the discussion I opened on Talk:Eastern Orthodox Church. You're miscounting. That's why the other editor reverted herself. Elizium23 (talk) 21:04, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Due to your disruptive behavior, I requested a ban for you: here.--UkrainianSavior1 (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The link provided links to my request for you to be banned. Veverve (talk) 00:05, 12 December 2019 (UTC)


 * And likewise, I have provided the same in turn. UkrainianSavior1 (talk) 00:07, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Epiphanius I of Ukraine at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:20, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Epiphanius I of Ukraine
Hello! Your submission of Epiphanius I of Ukraine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:15, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * sorry, after asking and seeing my DYK did not meet the criteria, I forgot to ask for deletion. Thanks for reminding me.

Mar Thoma Syrian Church
Hello Veverve. I notice you've been recently active on this page, so may know something about the disputes there. Can you understand why some editors want to label this church as protestant? This seems to be an unusual claim, if the church itself does not make this statement. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:10, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I am active only because this page is on my watchlist and there is an ongoing dispute. I tried to make the two main parties discuss, but they seem unwilling to discuss. Sadly, I do not know much about this specific church, so I cannot give you any insight or untie the Gordian knot. Veverve (talk) 18:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

No, they really don't. Maybe an arbitration would fix this months long problem. Veverve (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Firstly, I didn't say they're fully nor Western Christian-like St. Thomas Christian denomination. As I saw, based on the page's history is strongly implying they wanted to be somewhere as Semi-Eastern Christian with Protestant elements, as a way to compromise with its Colonial invaders and its Catholic/Protestant missionaries.


 * For you Veverve, that problem that I really wanted to discuss with that user, in my thought, but I feel psychologically and neurologically can't do that, like what wording to replying user back for a example; if that user is mostly makes that more bad English grammar. Or even if I could did replying the user, that user will make probably going on silence like I and he trying going into the user's talk page, and still continuously undoing by previous edit. Chad The Goatman (talk) 23:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Edit conflict
Um,, I've spent considerable time copyediting the section you started working on (as you requested). I'm going to move on to something else; let me know when you're finished.  Mini  apolis  15:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I am really sorry! I thought you had finished the section, hence why I started correcting factual errors you had introduced by copy editing. You can start the copy editing process again. I will correct once the article is completly copy edited. Sorry again! Veverve (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , I copyedit in as small sections as possible precisely to avoid edit conflicts and am pretty sure I maintained text-source integrity in my edits. Since you reverted work I put a lot of time into, and I would have to start that section all over again, it looks like you need another copyeditor. I'll make a notation at WP:GOCE/REQ of where I left off.  Mini  apolis  16:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Vulgata Sixtina
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Vulgata Sixtina has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * thanks a lot! I will allow myself to change a few things in the article, I really hope it does not bother you. I appreciate your work and do not want to disrespect what you accomplished. Veverve (talk) 16:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Feel free to change what you wish. Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vulgata Sixtina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Lang ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Vulgata_Sixtina check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Vulgata_Sixtina?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Moscow–Constantinople schism edit revert
Why did you revert my edit? The content as it stands is grammatically incorrect.St Judas the Lazarene (talk) 07:05, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Adding a line break in the middle of a sentence does not fix it. You probably made atypo mistake. Veverve (talk) 11:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Oh, did I do that? Sorry, my bad. FYI, 'announce' is a verb only. The noun is 'announcement', but in this situation 'statement' would be the typical word to use in English. --St Judas the Lazarene (talk) 09:13, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * yes, you did. Feel free to correct again, but this time without introducing a superfluous line break :) Veverve (talk) 15:19, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Nova Vulgata copy edit
Hi - just to let you know I've accepted your request at WP:GOCE/REQ to copy edit Nova Vulgata. Please don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any questions or comments on the process or copy editing choices. I'll let you know if I have any questions too. Regards - FiveFaintFootprints (talk) 23:37, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * thanks for accepting my request and warning me! If you could, could you reduce the number of quotes in the article by paraphrasing them? Veverve (talk) 23:54, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * One's already done! Thanks - I'll keep working on those, then. Regards - FiveFaintFootprints (talk) 23:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

I need you review
I have created two vast artivles in ruwiki and tranferred to enwiki by tranlsation: Joining of the Archdiocese of Russian Orthodox churches in Western Europe to the Moscow Patriarchate and Orthodox International Youth Festival "Bratya". ~ Чръный человек (talk) 13:02, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Archdiocese_of_Russian_Orthodox_churches_in_Western_Europe really needs to be merged with Joining of the Archdiocese of Russian Orthodox churches in Western Europe to the Moscow Patriarchate. Veverve (talk) 15:48, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your work. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 12:53, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * could you either try to correct first Orthodox International Youth Festival "Bratya" by yourself or request copy editing or both? By the way, if you request copy editing do not edit while the copy editor is working on the article. Veverve (talk) 17:12, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sixto-Clementine Vulgate
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sixto-Clementine Vulgate you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 18:01, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Bible translations into Geʽez at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sixtine Vulgate
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sixtine Vulgate you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 23:21, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sixto-Clementine Vulgate
The article Sixto-Clementine Vulgate you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sixto-Clementine Vulgate for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 22:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sixtine Vulgate
The article Sixtine Vulgate you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sixtine Vulgate for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 03:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Reply from JasonWikis
Hey you asked me about my Confraternity Bible...

I don't believe I own that particular volume anymore, however I do have other Confraternity bible's like it. I could take pictures of them if you'd like me to. Sorry for taking a little while to get back to you.Jason WikiP (talk) 17:19, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for replying, it is not a problem whatever time it took you. Yes, I think it would be good to take a picture of them; more precisely, if you could take a picture of a cover to illustrate the article, that would greatly improve the article.
 * Also, I asked you if you had taken any other picture and uploaded them to WP or Commons.
 * Veverve (talk) 20:06, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sixtine Vulgate
The article Sixtine Vulgate you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sixtine Vulgate for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 00:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Vulgate manuscripts at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 17:26, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bible translations into Geʽez
Hello! Your submission of Bible translations into Geʽez at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —  Fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124; 18:08, 16 March 2020 (UTC)