User talk:Vfrickey/Archives/2016/November

?
about this, that was a revert of an edit to the policy, not its talk page. you probably want to self-revert that... Jytdog (talk) 19:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks, and done. Also drew attention in the talk page to the issue with Aoziwe's proposed version, which makes vigilance against "laundering" of primary source material as secondary in our articles optional; if WP:INDY and WP:SECONDARY mean anything, they shouldn't be evaded if the editor doesn't feel like doing what ought to be due diligence. I see what he's saying about broad consensus, but we had that on the two guidelines I just mentioned. I don't see why enforcing them requires going to an RFC. loupgarous (talk) 19:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)