User talk:Vi1618

Logos
Please don't decorate biographies with professional association logos. This comes off as promotional and I'm not sure about the license for that image at any rate. Kuru  (talk)  15:03, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Santhi Ganapathy


A tag has been placed on Santhi Ganapathy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Invitrovanitas (talk) 10:08, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of G. Ramaswamy


A tag has been placed on G. Ramaswamy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; RHaworth 17:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

t== Don't add primary references in Institute of Chartered Accountants of India ==

At the outset, I congratulate your effort in improving the article on Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. But I would like to bring some important issues before you. I noticed that you have added a lot of references from the institutes website. I strongly recommend that you withdraw from doing so. A reference from a primary source like the institutes website will be termed as not being reliable in Wikipedia. As you are aware the article has been failed as a Good Article nominee because of this thrice. I have been undertaking the activity of replacing the primary references with external ones in a phased manner. You have added quiet a lot of primary references again which is distorting the whole process. If you continue adding primary references, the dream of getting Good Article status for the article will remain a dream forever.  R.Sivanesh ✆ 08:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear Vi1618, I never said that your intentions are wrong. Your contributions to the Wikipedia is always welcome. Particularly the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India article needs to developed. The way you have added references shows that you are new to the wikipedia. References are added to confirm claims and points quoted in the article in order to make them verifiable from reliable third-party sources. It should be added within the tags . You and I know that anything present in ICAI's website is highly reliable. But for other wikipedians they will say that they are primary sources so they are not reliable. That is what I meant. R.Sivanesh ✆ 08:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Barn Stars
The Barn stars that you are displaying on your user page should be presented to you by someone and you cannot copy it from some one. There are like awards presented to you by other Wikipedians. Please remove them and work to earn them. R.Sivanesh ✆ 11:00, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

References in ICAI
Dear Vi1618, you don't seem to know how to add references. A reference should be added within the tags. For giving better info it is good to use references templetes like citeweb. This can be easily done by using the links given in the edit tool bar. I see you are adding reference urls with bar double bar brackets ( R.Sivanesh ✆ 08:55, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Renaming the Accountancy Task Force to Institute of Wiki Accountants
I have placed a proposal to rename Accountancy Task Force to Institute of Wiki Accountants. Please place your valuable comments at Accountancy Task Force Talk page. -- R.Sivanesh ✆ © 10:55, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CA. T.V. Mohandas Pai


A tag has been placed on CA. T.V. Mohandas Pai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 02:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of South Asian Federation of Accountants for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South Asian Federation of Accountants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/South Asian Federation of Accountants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of T. V. Mohandas Pai for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article T. V. Mohandas Pai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/T. V. Mohandas Pai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Ratnahastin (talk) 05:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)