User talk:Viaboston13

Unspecified source for Image:221t.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:221t.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ↔NMajdan &bull;talk 17:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Duplex Concert1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Duplex Concert1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:221t.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:221t.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. mattbr30 20:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:IMG 3592Glo.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:IMG 3592Glo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. mattbr30 20:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:IMG 2416NG-2.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:IMG 2416NG-2.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. mattbr30 20:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Duplex Concert1.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Duplex Concert1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. mattbr30 20:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Page protection and deletion
Pages can only be protected by administrators, and the page must meet the criteria in the Protection policy before this happens. Bettinna does not appear to meet any of the criteria so it is unlikely any request for page protection would be granted. The act of protection is not done by placing one of the protection notices on the page, so including these will not protect the article.

Regarding the article, the page was previously deleted as the result of an Articles for deletion discussion (see here), and that is why I have tagged the page for deletion. Please do not delete the template, but add  to the page and follow the instructions if you wish to contest it. Thanks, mattbr30 22:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Do not remove the deletion template
Do not remove the deletion template from Bettinna. To contest the deletion put  on the page and put your reason for contesting on the article's talk page. mattbr30 23:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Delete? Explain
Please read the first message I posted on this topic. Bettinna was previously deleted as the result of an Articles for deletion discussion at this page, and that is why I have tagged the page for deletion under speedy deletion criterion G4 - Recreation of deleted material. To ask that the page not be deleted you need to follow the instructions on the templates, which tells you to place  on the page and then explain why you don't want it deleted on the talk page.

Please also note that I do not believe the article meets the notability guidelines, particularly for music. Also, the article does not provide reliable sources to make the information verifiable. The page may also be considered for deletion because they lack these. mattbr30 23:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)