User talk:Viacea

March 2022
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 17:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi MrOllie,
 * I understand the reasoning behind removal of this citation. The reason I added it because it seems very likely that the existing pseudocode in the section was copied from there (same variable names and structure). In hindsight, probably both the website and wiki copied it from a common place which I am unable to find. Given the similarity of the citation and existing pseudocde, I added it along with reusing the existing citation. The other citation also has a pseudocode, albeit with some different variable names and approach, which might confuse some beginner learners.
 * P.S. I am in no way affiliated with the cited website. I came across this error when researching Dijkstra' Algo. Viacea (talk) 17:57, 16 March 2022 (UTC)