User talk:ViamarisBalbi

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, ViamarisBalbi. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Aristophanes 68  (talk)  05:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you made a change to an article, André Ayew, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 07:27, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ana Khouri (designer)


A tag has been placed on Ana Khouri (designer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 00:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


 * This absence of a viable page is a great reason for this person to not be listed on Khouri. See WP:BLP policy and the WP:NLIST/WP:WTAF guideline and essay. DMacks (talk) 18:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC

It says the page was deleted because it was written in a way that seemed to promote her not because the person is not notable.ViamarisBalbi (talk) 18:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, I'm Khirurg. Your recent edit to the page Archimedes appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Khirurg (talk) 21:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Khirurg (talk) 23:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not do on Thales of Miletus ‎. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Dr.  K.  06:26, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Thales of Miletus ‎. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Dr.  K.  06:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

If you look at the history of Thales of Miletus you will see that on the 2nd of October, Katolophyromai, a few other editors and I reached a consensus about how to write the section regarding Thales's ancestry. Today, all of a sudden, he reverts everything that was achieved through that consensus. Hence the reasons for my "disrespectful" edit reversalViamarisBalbi (talk) 07:00, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Thales of Miletus. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Dr.  K.  07:01, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

I have not attacked anyone. If you look at the history of Thales of Miletus you will see that on the 2nd of October, Katolophyromai, a few other editors and I reached a consensus about how to write the section regarding Thales's ancestry. Today, all of a sudden, he reverts everything that was achieved through that consensus. Hence the reasons for my "disrespectful" edit reversal ViamarisBalbi (talk) 07:03, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Khirurg (talk) 07:10, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Dr.  K.  07:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for personal attacks and 3RR violation on Thales of Miletus, with an obvious nationalist agenda. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; talk 09:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: Please see the sample diffs supplied on the edit warring noticeboard. If you continue to edit with a nationalist agenda, you're likely to end up indefinitely blocked, because that is not tolerated on Wikipedia. Bishonen &#124; talk 10:04, 5 November 2017 (UTC).

Your recent editing history at Euclid shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dr.  K.  01:19, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Dr.  K.  01:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Kuru  (talk)  02:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * When others contest your changes, please use the article's talk page to resolve the dispute. "I am not sure if you are Greek, a Nazi, plain antisemitic, or whatever" is not acceptable. I'm afraid that the next block for similar commentary will likely be the last.  Kuru   (talk)  02:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:53, 14 November 2017 (UTC)