User talk:Vianello/Archives/2010/September

King Orgasmus One
fyi, I have restored King Orgasmus One as there are a category of works by this person, and the article exists in three other languages. Feel free to take it to WP:Afd. John Vandenberg (chat) 07:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Jeremy Childs (Internet Personality)
Hello, I was wondering if you can kindly tell me what would have been a better option for this article,To me it seemed that the article was created about the person who has no nobility of Db-person (Csd 7) would it have been something else? Thank you for your time -Cheers -- Staffwaterboy Critique Me  06:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Amor Mío (Eddie Dee album)
Don't forget Amor Mío (Eddie Dee album). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:44, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Lehigh Gorge Scenic Railway
Hi,

Think you will find that the above is a valid A7 organisation/company ? Codf1977 (talk) 17:31, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * No Problem Codf1977 (talk) 21:18, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Unblock
Hi there, you may be interested in the unblock request at User talk:Duphin. I would be tempted to give the user a second chance. Cheers, Tiptoety  talk 22:06, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for unblocking me it was cool of you, i'll try to remember to sign in if i edit in future so that i don't cause any more confusion ^_^ thanks again. --Duphin (talk) 23:18, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

CSD
Hi Vianello, FYI I've quoted some CSD tags in an RFA !vote, including one that you deleted - you might want to see Requests for adminship/Wifione. Regards  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  22:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

SEO 2.0 Resubmission
BrendaBooker (talk) 21:58, 14 September 2010 (UTC)BrendaBooker Please see SEO 2.0 Discussion for recreation of article with no ulterior motives.


 * Regarding the SEO 2.0 article (which I personally feel should be salted), there has been a concerted effort to remove the traces of abuse related to previous creations of it, including the contributions from 76.109.164.159, 193.202.110.42, 91.121.221.57 and 64.134.145.44. Some of the content deletions involve blanking or refactoring of warnings and discussions concerning removal of the article Clinton Cimring/Clinton cimring and abuse by User:ClintonCimring, who created a number of self-interested articles a couple of years ago, and who is named in the SEO 2.0 article as having coined the term. This edit is particularly telling. I rather suspect that Clinton Cimring is involved in this still, but I suspect that his account has been dormant for too long for a SPI to be meaningful. --bonadea contributions talk 06:41, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Just FTR, I have started a COIN discussion about this article. It's probably best to keep the discussion centralised. --bonadea contributions talk 12:51, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Spanish second republic and catholicism
If you read the new lead that Mamalujo has written you should be able to see that he has no interest in presenting an NPOV treatment of the matter. sentences like " Although the statement was an intentional deception, the propaganda was accepted by many of the faithful" This is sourced to the pro-Franco Stanley Payne as is much else in the lead and all articles by Mamalujo. Are you familiar with this period in spanish history? He deleted much sourced text to write his version. Tosser wasnt very good as an edit summary but expresses frustration at the way editors like this operate - I think history and politics is no go for NPOV people really, wikipedia will have to sort it out if  it can. Are you a knight of st columba? Sayerslle (talk) 22:56, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * mamalujo removed the sourced material and replaced it en masse, he did not work with the material already there. Are you a knight of st columba?Sayerslle (talk) 23:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * In politics, from the greek for citizen, polites, openness with regard to poitical/religious alignment is healthy. wikipedia is open democratic, political and religious alignments should be  open. Why not ? I think there was sourced neutral material, mamalujo should have added to it if he thought it unbalanced if I get your drift,  but he removed the lead en masse and replaced it with a single sourced POV piece. I don't believe your religious/political sympathies/memberships are irrelevant - why would they be? Sayerslle (talk) 23:28, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

The La Chapla
I don't think an indefinite block was the answer; due to the fact his/her only made two contribs before the block. I don't think his/her actions were appropriate but I don't think his/her knew any better, I think they were good faith edits from a newcomer. -- Inka 888 22:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Phoenix Software International
I am the marketing manager for Phoenix Software International. You deleted a page about Phoenix Software International and any links to it from other pages. The Phoenix Software page was added by a third party. I did go in and edit some of the pages that had competitive products listed or mentioned and put in our company as well, while also cleaning up those pages.

Now, Phoenix is missing from these pages where we have made important contributions, while our competitors remain linked there. Phoenix Software is an important player in the mainframe world. I think if you asked some of our Fortune 500 customers and government entities, they would say that we are as important to their system administrators as IBM is. I don't believe we should be singled out and deleted while our competitors (some of them much smaller and less important than us) are allowed to remain.

Amygil (talk) 20:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Page Deletion
I was the creator of The Lightning Love page you recently deleted. I created a disambiguation page, due to the fact that when you google "Lightning Love" Every link is in reference to the popular Ypsilanti based band, but when you click the wiki link, it defaults to the irrelevant 1923 film. I understand the importance of keeping the film article, but I think it would be an easier navigation for users to have the option, upon clicking the link, to choose the band, or the film. For example, if you google "Bright Eyes"(popular band),click the wiki link, you have multiple options, the band, Simon and Garfunkel song, etc. You have also cited CSD A7, from my understanding I need to emphasize the importance of the article, by using references. I believe I have used 3 different references on the page, from very credible sources, (Metro Times, Motor City Rocks). I have also mentioned in the article, the link between "Lightning Love", and the "Von Bondies" the latter being a very popular national act. As you may notice, I am new to Wikipedia editing, I suppose if you were to explain in more detail, what I need to do to meet the guidelines ( I already felt like I was) I can better understand your position. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mafiosoitalian (talk • contribs) 16:17, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Homosexual eugenics CSD
Hey there, just in case you don't have the CSD on your watch-list, I just wanted to say here too that I didn't mean to imply you were claiming credit at all; in fact, I was just referring to you for your deletion reasoning. No hard feelings or confusion I hope! KaySL talk 02:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Vianello, you left one of the longest and most appreciated comments in the support column in my RfA. I'm dropping in to say my thanks for the wonderful support. I appreciate each and every word you left. Kind regards.  Wifione    .......  Leave a message  16:11, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

24.180.106.119
This IP seems to be on a wiki rampage. I have warned him about his conduct, but he insists on removing Nazi allegiance flags from WWII articles. I suspect it is blocked user JKGREINEDER who has been blocked for this and other things. I have left a note on the incidents page. This is just a heads up. Dapi89 (talk) 16:22, 23 September 2010 (UTC)