User talk:Vianello/Archives/2011/February

Speedy Deletion of CoWorker Online
Dear Vianello

The page about CoWorker Online has been marked by you for speedy deletion per CSD A7. Very interesting that the page of CoWorker Online must be deleted then hundred of pages exists under the same category. If you could clarify for me why people should not be allowed to read about CoWorker Online when other similar companies are listed. Have a look under the page Comparison of accounting software. Here there are several software companies listed and they all have a page about the company itself - except CoWorker Online. When I designed the page for CoWorker Online, I took a copy of one of the exisitng listings and made the required changes so it shows the information about CoWorker Online. No extra content trying to advertise the product or company, just pure information based on the same structure as the other listings. It then seems strange that my page must be deleted, but the one I copied from can stay? Is this a personal choice of the administrator? If so, I don't think the nature of Wikipedia is right. The idea of Wikipedia is to get information about the subject and company. Having your page deleted per CSD A7 knowing you copied the structure of the content from an existing page seems a bit strange to me. Also the idea of having a link on Comparison of accounting software to each company mentioned is to read more about the company and get more detailed information. It seems irrellevant to me that the content can be considered as "No indication of importance" when in fact the company is listed on the wikipedia list. Is the choice of CSD A7 to "hide" the information of CoWorker Online from people? Why are they not allowed to read more about CoWorker Online? Why are people allowed to read about ALL the other companies but not CoWorker Online? What more information does the other companies provide that CoWorker Online did not provide? If CoWorker Online should be deleted for the reason "No indication of importance" then all the other company pages should also be deleted. That would only be fair, but by only deleting CoWorker Online under the CSD A7 seems to me like a pesonal attack on the company. How else can you translate this choice? Sorry for all the questions but is this situation I find it very hard to understand the choice for CSD A7.

Your Truly

Dan Nicolaysen, CoWorker Online — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicolays (talk • contribs) 01:34, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

STL Queue deletion
You have mistakenly deleted the article about C++ STL queue container supplying useless shitty article instead (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queue_(data_structure)). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.194.3.6 (talk) 16:23, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: AccountsPortal
Hello Vianello, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of AccountsPortal, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to software. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:17, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Total least squares
Hi Vianello, you blocked a vandal yesterday, but it is happening again, as one of the editors pointed out on my talk page. Please see the recent history. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 18:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Mikeymike2001
This user is reverting articles without any reason again (as he always do). Maybe he will start an edit war soon. Thanks for the attention. WWEJobber (talk) 18:28, 28 February 2011 (UTC)