User talk:Vianello/Archives/2011/November

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Promachoteuthis dentures.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Promachoteuthis dentures.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:37, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Promachoteuthis sulcus.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Promachoteuthis sulcus.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Glyptapanteles.png
Thanks for uploading File:Glyptapanteles.png, which you've sourced to http://www.plosone.org/article/slideshow.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0002276&imageURI=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0002276.g001. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:42, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

File licensing
I see that you uploaded, stating that it is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. In fact, the image is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License - Version 3.0, as stated on the page to which you linked. The CC Attribution-NonCommercial License is not compatible with Wikipedia's licensing terms. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:24, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary
Wishing Vianello a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Armbrust Talk to me  Contribs  00:17, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey! I never got one of these. Not fair. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:34, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
Your decline of the speedy deletion of The Three Worlds indicates that you have not read the notes at Talk:The Three Worlds.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 07:53, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Shannon Flynn (director)
You deleted a soft redirect per CSD A3. A3 does not apply here - see CSD "Any article (other than disambiguation pages, redirects, or soft redirects)". I did note this on the talk page. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:39, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the restore. Please also restore the talk page. I put some explanatory info there. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:44, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 * Oh. Hello to you too! - Vianello (Talk) 06:34, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you
...for the quick help. That was a particularly odd one, and a little disturbing. Just want to say how much I, and I'm sure countless others, appreciate all the extra and so necessary work that admins take on. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 04:08, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Annnnd, he's back. Under the IP User:58.178.145.167, the previously blocked anon IP User:58.178.150.189 has returned as to Rango (2011 film) today to make the same inaccurate nonsense edit. I left him at message at his original page. It looks like IP range 58.178 is the problem. Thanks for any attention to this. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 16:35, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I am so sorry to keep bothering you. That seemingly disturbed individual is evading his block to return again to Rango (2011 film), making the same inaccurate nonsense edit under the IP 58.178.146.78 ... after his having been blocked 31 hours on Nov. 8 as 58.178.150.189 and blocked another 31 hours on Nov. 9 as /58.178.145.167.


 * He's also left yet another nonsense post, creepily linking to a girl's Facebook page, at my talk page (under another anon IP, 210.50.115.243).


 * Since it seems as if this 58.178 IP is an incorrigible vandal, I'm wondering if if might not be advisable to block that IP range, as I've sometimes seen admins do. And possibly semi-protect Rango (2011 film)? It doesn't look like this person is going to stop.


 * You were nice enough to get involved at the start, and I hate that this person is creating extra work for you (and me, come to think). I appreciate your patience. And again, I thank you sincerely for any help. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 03:08, 10 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh, my, no apologies necessary! You admins take on so much more work than the rest of us, having to go on noticeboards and then handle disputes, vandals and assorted craziness. That's a job in itself. I've thought about applying for adminship, but I'm not sure I could handle the extra workload. My heartfelt appreciation goes out to all of you.--Tenebrae (talk) 03:16, 10 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, Vianello. Hope you had a good Thanksgiving. I just wanted to alert you again to what is now a pair of IP vandals at Rango (2011 film) &mdash; the original 58.178-range "Carrington" person and 65.35.201.35, whom I've tried to engage in dialog at User talk:65.35.201.35 &mdash; each making disruptive and incorrect edits. I've attempted to explain the issue regarding the latter IP at Talk:Rango (2011 film). I hate to keep asking for your help, but if you could....? With thanks, --Tenebrae (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * As 202.67.108.115 now, he's linked here to that young woman's Facebook page again. Near as I can tell, he's trying to impress some girl named Angelique Carrington by continually adding "Carrington" to the name of the "Angelique" character in Rango. It's gotten to a point where I think it's a realistic possibility that this person may be disturbed. This is all so odd. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:32, 28 November 2011 (UTC)