User talk:Vibhijain/Archive 18

See this
Exclusion of numbers is less informative: Sitush is white-washing the article. In Wikipedia the more information one article has the better. Numbers put perspective into things. "Many" is an imprecise word. We don't add imprecise things deliberately. Mr T (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 16:24, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:02, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for List of international cricket centuries by Greg Chappell
Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Good work Vibhi! Fai  zan  09:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 14:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Kings XI Punjab cricketers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Miller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:38, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

FYI
Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Mark Waugh/archive1 &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  07:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Sandese Aate Hai
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sockpuppet (Internet)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sockpuppet (Internet). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 01:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Highlights from April 2013
Highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation Report and the Wikimedia engineering report for April 2013, with a selection of other important events from the Wikimedia movement About &middot; Subscribe/unsubscribe &middot; Distributed via Global message delivery, 17:31, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Wikimedia Foundation highlights
 * New notifications system launches on the English Wikipedia
 * Wikidata's content can now be used on all Wikipedias
 * Wikimedia Commons app announced for iOS and Android
 * Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) publishes its recommendations about $1.2 million
 * New conflict of interest guidelines
 * Data and Trends
 * Financials
 * Other movement highlights
 * Chapters conference and GLAM-Wiki events
 * Students create the first online Arabic-Serbian dictionary
 * "Wiki Loves Sound" enriches Wikipedia with audio recordings

FLC
Hi, this one is on the board since April 25, could you please review this? Regards, Zia Khan 23:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

, we moved your Teahouse host profile
Hello Vibhijain! Thank you for being a host at the Teahouse. However, we haven't heard from you lately, so our bot has moved your Host profile from the host landing page to the host breakroom. No worries; you can always just and our bot will move your profile back. Editing any Teahouse-related page will do the same thing for you. If you would prefer not to receive reminders like this, you can unsubscribe here. Thanks for your help at the Teahouse! HostBot (talk) 03:50, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:39, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:37, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alger Hiss
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Alger Hiss. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 01:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

INCOTM
Hi, you are receiving this message because your name is listed at INCOTM/Members, where people indicate their interest in the India Project Collaboration of the Month (INCOTM).

INCOTM is restarting and you are welcome to nominate articles for collaborative improvement during July 2013. - Sitush (talk) 12:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: May 2013
Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 22:54, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre
{||}

Proposed deletion of Sanskrit Wikipedia


The article Sanskrit Wikipedia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable version of Wikipedia: the article either includes only non-independent and self-published sources (especially Wikipedia itself), or has no sources at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. eh bien mon prince (talk) 00:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Frédéric Fontang
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Frédéric Fontang. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 01:15, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of international cricket centuries by Greg Chappell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohammad Yousuf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Highlights from May 2013
Highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation Report and the Wikimedia engineering report for May 2013, with a selection of other important events from the Wikimedia movement About &middot; Subscribe/unsubscribe &middot; Distributed via Global message delivery, 16:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Wikimedia Foundation highlights
 * Community invited to discuss trademark practices
 * Wikipedia Zero launches in Pakistan
 * Search for new Executive Director begins
 * Data and Trends
 * Financials
 * Other movement highlights
 * More than 11,000 nature photos in Ukrainian "Wiki loves Earth" contest
 * Hackathons in Amsterdam and Tel Aviv
 * Railway photo expedition in Poland
 * Online course about editing Wikipedia articles

RE:Bow Tie Cigar
I don't think you were off the mark with your first response to Prpiranha. I think he is probably a PR agent, not the owner of the company. I have explained exhaustively to him the issues and he keeps resubmitting the article for review without addressing them. Doesn't seem to want to understand notability, even though he states he has "read the applicable policies". I've been here a year and a half, and I still haven't read all the applicable policies. He's been here two days. Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree. Neither he has any reliable online source. Most magazines are available online. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 06:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * He denies it on my talk page, but the tone of the article sure makes that questionable. Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:04, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

This Month in Education: June 2013
 If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription &middot; Distributed via Global message delivery, 14:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject AFC needs your help... again
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Delivered at 13:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:27, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 01:15, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Paid editing
I am curious about this claim that you made earlier today. Which contributors in the topic area are being paid to edit? Where is your evidence? - Sitush (talk) 12:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You've also (I think) made this claim earlier (here). Paid editors are expected to identify themselves and not edit directly in areas where they are being compensated monetarily. You should indicate which editors you believe are paid editors (along with your evidence). --regentspark (comment) 13:49, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Chor ki daadhi mein tinka?! §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 14:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Eh? That sounds like you are accusing me of paid editing, Dharmadhyaksha. Proof? - Sitush (talk) 14:49, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It has a question mark and not a full stop. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 14:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You don't need to teach me grammar, thanks. What was the point of your comment? All I can see is a snide insinuation but I'm willing to let you explain and thus avoid potential sanctions. For example, were you referring to me or RegentsPark? Would you care to give your translation? Etc. - Sitush (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Ignore DD Sitush. For some obscure reason he has morphed into a wise cracking editor who prefers to make snide comments rather than work constructively with other editors. I much preferred the original AnimeshKulkarni, but we can't have everything. --regentspark (comment) 16:11, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Sitush, spare yourself all the efforts of trying to threaten me with blocks and bans. It might work with all those new comers on caste article. And RP, beauty lies in the eyes of beholder. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 17:29, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

I have not seen RegentsPark questioning Maunus when similar accusations were made against other users –. Your selective attentiveness to these claims is disturbing. — Nearly Headless Nick   {c}  09:09, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Let me clarify all this. My comment was NOT about Sitush. He is a well based editor. I was referring to some new editors and their knowledge of the policies was a little surprising in newbies. Also their edits were pro-congress on articles like Digvijay Singh, and anti-BJP on Narendra Modi. Since I have got no proof, I won't like to mention has editor's name. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 15:47, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification Vaibhav. Still, you want to be careful about paid editor (or other) insinuations. Perhaps the editors merely have a pov or they are editing in good faith (hard to tell when the number of edits is low). Always best to hold your suspicions close to your chest until you have sufficient evidence to back them up. --regentspark (comment) 19:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 21:29, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

, we moved your Teahouse host profile
Hello Vibhijain! Thank you for being a host at the Teahouse. However, we haven't heard from you lately, so our bot has moved your Host profile from the host landing page to the host breakroom. No worries; you can always just and our bot will move your profile back. Editing any Teahouse-related page will do the same thing for you. If you would prefer not to receive reminders like this, you can unsubscribe here. Thanks for your help at the Teahouse! HostBot (talk) 03:50, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello
Hi Vibhijain!I had asked user:StrikeEagle regarding a CVU trainer,he wasn't available due to his schedule but he suggested your name,so is it possible if you could be my CVU trainer? P.S:I am really impressed with your achievements!Great going vibhi! Uncletomwood (talk) 15:11, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I will do anything to work with a former CRPF jawan. To start, answer some basic questions here. Jai Hind! ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 15:33, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Not a Jawan an Assistant Commandant five ranks higher than a jawan vaibhav! :) Uncletomwood (talk) 16:24, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * That's great! But I still prefer to call every soldier as jawan. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 16:37, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:29, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, Vibhijain, you'll likely not be pleased about this but I have suppressed a number of edits to your userspace which reveal too much personally identifiable information about yourself. I've done this per policy and for your own protection and safety on-line as you are a self-declared minor. I'm really sorry about that and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add it. For some useful information on privacy and safety, take a look at Guidance for younger editors. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages. -- Worm TT( talk ) 07:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC)


 * No Problem! :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 14:06, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter
We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to  for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, and  being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:34, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 01:18, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:25, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review of Jainism
Hi, I have placed the article Jainism for peer-review. You might be interested in it. The link is here: Peer_review/Jainism/archive4. Cheers, Rahul Jain (talk) 07:18, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 11:28, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: June 2013
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 15:23, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 July 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:51, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Kuldeep Raval (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Saurashtra


 * Tejashwi Yadav (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to News 24

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

List of Delhi Daredevils cricketers
On this article, there is a list of uncapped players. What does "uncapped" mean? A player who actually didn't play? Could that be clarified in the article? Maybe its a common word in cricket lingo. I am fully unaware of it and hence thought of asking here instead of tagging it on the article. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 11:12, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Uncapped refers to any player who has been a part of the squad but did not played any match. It can also refer to someone who has not represented his country at international level. Therefore to avoid confusion I have already explained this in the third para of the lead. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 11:24, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay! Thanks. I missed that line. Was looking only in the key section. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 03:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)



IRC office hours for wiki-mentors and Snuggle users
Hi. We're organizing an office hours session with the Teahouse to bring in mentors from across the wiki to and discuss it's potential to support mentorship broadly. The Snuggle team would appreciate it if you would come and participate in the discussion. We'll be having it in on '''Wed. July 17th @ 1600 UTC'''. See the agenda for more info. -- EpochFail (talk &bull; work), Technical 13 (talk), TheOriginalSoni (talk) 19:11, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bishop Bell School
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bishop Bell School. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 02:15, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

This Month in Education: July 2013
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription &middot; Distributed via Global message delivery, 22:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)