User talk:Vibhijain/Archive 3

A barnstar for you!

 * Through I am not sure will I be a en wiki admin, thanks for the barnstar, I can see some chances of you becoming a admin someday, however I will just give one advice, try to follow WP:ENJOY, and everything will look like fine and pleasant. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 15:53, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

No categories for redirect pages
Please do not assign categories for redirect pages and please refrain from making inappropriate comments about legitimate edits by others. If you are unsure about Wikipedia style, please consult help pages or ask one of the administrators for help. 203.173.210.79 (talk) 01:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * My mistake, sorry. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 05:02, 15 October 2011 (UTC)


 * This is incorrect. Redirects are often appropriately categorized.


 * If the redirect is "printworthy", i.e. it is the only name of that distinct form that will appear in a list or category, then it should be categorized, just as for a normal page. If it's merely a redir to correct a mis-spelling, or a very similar alternate name, then we might wish to avoid duplication in a category and so don't categorize it alongside other redirs to this target, or even the target itself.


 * Note that we also have a range of tag templates specifically for redirs, which categorize redirs as "alternate names" etc. See R printworthy, R with possibilities, R alternate name etc.
 * Andy Dingley (talk) 11:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Hi Vibhijain. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Perrukuppam pond, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. ''I've removed the speedy deletion tag on the article because it doesn't fall under any of the categories of A7. A7 only applies to individuals, animals, organizations, web content, not geographic locations.'' Inks.LWC (talk) 08:51, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrolling
Hi Vibhijain. I'm just  letting  you  know that  I  have declined your CSD on  World Islam Association WIA. This appears to be a woldwide organisation, therefore it  might  be notable. Please do some more research, and if you  still  think  it  is not notable, put  a PROD on  it  instead. Happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:38, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Did it, this article seems a WP:HOAX. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 10:45, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Livingstone Primary School, Melbourne


A tag has been placed on Livingstone Primary School, Melbourne, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:47, 15 October 2011 (UTC)


 * You've misunderstood the consensus: neither Livingston Primary School is notable. The consensus was clearly to redirect both.  No one in the deletion discussion mentioned anything about keeping either school.  Qwyrxian (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined for Celia Graham
Hi. Just to let you know that I have declined the speedy deletion of Celia Graham. A7 is where there is no credible assertion of notability; in this instance the claim is that she was the lead in a couple of major musicals. Granted, these could easilyt be amateur productions, not necessarily West End/Broadway productions, but the assertion is there.

In instances like this, where there is assertion but no references, it is better to tag it for PRODBLP and give the editor the chance to add references. I've tagged it, so hopefully the article will get corrected. Stephen! Coming... 21:24, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

G12 speedy deletions
Hi, in cases of copyright infringement could you please make sure you check the source website for a statement releasing the content under CC-BY-SA and GFDL? In the specific case I'm referring to, Underprivileged Community Life In the Present Culture, the author added such a notice to his website after I added a G12 tag to the article, thus making it ineligible for speedy deletion under G12 (See WP:Donating Copyrighted Material). Thanks, &mdash; Oli OR Pyfan! 08:35, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry i just saw "Copyright © 2011 DANIEL WILLY YOKOM. ". ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 08:37, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

A cookie for you!
Hi Vibhijain. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Hillside primary school lower early reading, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Schools are not eligible for CSD A7, please see template. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:16, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * But an another admin deleted the page under the same criteria. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 12:26, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes. Probably  did not  realise it  was a school. Nobody  is perfect. I  make mistakes myself sometimes - but  not  very  often :)  It  could have been tagged A1 because there was too little information  to  identify  the school -  no  location, no  country, no  nothing. It  would have been deleted anyway. --12:37, 16 October 2011 (UTC)Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)

Indian Babu
Hello, Your decision to revert me based on a dead link was incorrect. There are a couple of things that were wrong there: first, the link being dead doesn't make an article a hoax, it makes it unreferenced. Our first goal with an unref'd article is to reference it. A simple google search (such as this) shows many references. Rather than deleting the article, we'd add references, which I just did. Second, please be aware that you shouldn't revert an admin's decision to decline a speedy. There are other options available, but you should never simply revert. First, go to the admin's talk page. If that doesn't work, go to AN/I... but you can't just readd a speedy tag. That's the sort of thing that might end up badly, because it's edit warring. I'm sure you didn't do that on purpose - I think you probably just didn't know the rules. :-) That's why I'm here, not to scold you, but to help you understand how to do this better.  Thank you for your contributions so far.  - Philippe  13:47, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

PS - the relevant policies are here. - Philippe 13:49, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox musical artist
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox musical artist. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 15:15, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tag
I think this was a bit premature, and perhaps a bit bitey. You tagged Dublin International Piano Competition for speedy deletion as spam. The article consisted solely of a restatement of the title, and a link to the subject's website. I don't consider that overly promotional. It might qualify under no content, but I would wait to allow the user to flesh the article out before making such a call. This particular user has received nothing but bad news for what appears to be a good-faith effort to expand the encyclopedia's content regarding Chinese music and musicians. Speedy deletion tags such as this one will certainly discourage the user from continuing this effort. I say this from my own perspective of having been accused (sometimes rightly so) of being overly bitey in the past, so I have been trying to temper my new page patrolling with an eye toward helping new users as well as the encyclopedia. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:59, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the suggestions, however if you see the link was also a dead one, it was seeming like a promotional article or a hoax. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 13:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * How is a dead link related to the article being termed promotional may I ask?  Lynch 7  13:07, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The right link is this, which comes just after removing the "|Official" tag from the original link. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 13:10, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Deleting Skinny taylor
Hi Vibhijain,

You're a more generous man than I am... I've added a G3 tag to your existing A7 one on this article. Clearly a vandal (as well as being non-notable). Yunshui (talk) 13:15, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I think one day movie directors will try to become a admin so that they can just see all delete article as sometimes they look like a brilliant film story. ;) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 14:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 100 euro note
I have put it on the first 'on hold'. It may be put on hold twice, as I am requesting a makeover. After the makeover I am going to do a commented review. Then it can be put on hold for a second time. I am awaiting your edits! – Plarem (User talk contribs) 21:22, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

flags
Please can you remove the flag icon from Rambhadracharya. See MOS:FLAG for justification, particluarly Avoid flag icons in infoboxes. Thanks. --Mirokado (talk) 14:26, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 14:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
 Lynch 7  15:21, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 11:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Ga Review
Hi, can you review any of these two GAN: Vikram and Karthi. The former was nominated before two months and badly needs a review. -- Commander (Ping Me) 11:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I will try to review Karthi. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 11:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:IMG 3085.JPG listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:IMG 3085.JPG. Since you had some involvement with the File:IMG 3085.JPG redirect, you might want to participate in (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:IMG 3045.JPG listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:IMG 3045.JPG. Since you had some involvement with the File:IMG 3045.JPG redirect, you might want to participate in (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Judas Maccabeus
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Judas Maccabeus. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 16:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Naing Win Swe
Hi. I'm just  wondering  why  you  have relisted this. As far as I can see, there is a clear consensus. AfD relistings are best left  to  experienced users and admins. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:29, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I was just closing it but seeing User:Inter rest's oppose made me more comfortable with re-listing, however if you want i can revert my edit. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 14:31, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It's entirely up  to  you  what  you  do. I can't  help  you  on  this    because I  commented on  that  RfA. All  I  can say  again  is, that  AfDs should generally  only  be relisted when there is no clear consensus, and  that  it  takes a very  experienced user to  be able to  assess and close AfDs. Perhaps you  should just  stick  to  !voting  on  AfDs  until you  are more familiar with  WP:NAC, WP:AfD, WP:IAR, and WP:CONSENSUS. I'll  be quite happy  to  explain  those policies for you  if you  find them  heavy  going. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Ya i will try to stick to voting till I am more familiar with the policies. Thanks for the help. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 14:48, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:24, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

IRC
Hi ! I'm not sure if you're aware of it, but I'd just like to inform you that there is an online webchat room where you can socialise and find help with experienced editors and myself. The room is at #wikipedia-en; a few people hang around there, so if you're interested, please come along. For more information, please see WP:IRC. --Sp33dyphil © • © 05:00, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi! I am aware of it, but i don't use it much, however i will surely come along. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 05:02, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Rambhadracharya bibliography/archive1
Some of my comments are still pending like missing subject, year and publisher. Please address those. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 06:06, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅-- ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 06:10, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry I meant summary/subject of the play. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 06:13, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry but i do not have any more detail about the play instead of its language and publisher. I will try to get a summary but it will be tough. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 06:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol - and some extra advice
Hi! Thanks for helping with new page patrol. I notice that you tagged A.S.S. Street Punk Tegernsee for deletion, only one minute after it was created. This is a really bad idea, as it can discourage new editors.

Please patrol from the back of the new page patrol list instead. Or at least, the pages that are a few hours old.

Please also read New pages patrol carefully to give you a better idea of how to deal with new change patrol.

Another page that you may find useful to read, is Guidance for younger editors. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 08:30, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Good Article (Islamabad marriott Hotel bombing)
As you worked hard for the 100 euro note. I'm starting a GA review of Islamabad Marriott Hotel bombing. Please help improve this and see initial comments at Talk:Islamabad Marriott Hotel bombing/GA2. Thank you --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 00:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * You can help me improve it. --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 20:58, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Aden! I will try to help with layout and format, but since i am not much knowlegeable about the attacks, i might not be able to help with content and sources. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 04:57, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Would you like to rewrite it well and clear --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 10:33, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Rambhadracharya bibliography
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   12:03, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

100 euro note
I have put you down for actively involved on the article 100 euro note. If you would like to 'resign' of that 'position', feel free to take yourself off the list. After all, we have the freedom of choice!

Happy editing, – Plarem (User talk contribs) 16:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Why was YRC Weblink Page Deleted?
Why was YRC Weblink page deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weblink123 (talk • contribs) 05:38, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The reason has been given in the deletion summary. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 06:53, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Discussing article Saffron terror
Hi, I see, | this article mostly being edited by Experienced Users (You know whom I'm referring to), who are either Congress supporters or Christians, having the motive to vandalize the image of Saffron/Hinduism. Your quick reply is expected. (come online on gtalk) Sourav Mohanty (talk) 06:24, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Souravmohanty2005, This will badly reflect on your perception as a neutral editor. Be careful when making these kinds of statements; these kinds of statements can be used and will be used against you whenever called for (to put it in the stylish FBI style).  Lynch 7  07:36, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The article has 69 references; you have to have a very strong case to move any of them. Please make constructive edits to the article, but not any edits that show bias. If you want to add criticism, please feel free to do so, but remember that it is a very hot and disputed article, and you'll need to explain yourself on the talk page. Please go through similar discussions at Talk:Christian terrorism to get an idea.  Lynch 7  08:07, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * See Sourav, i can accept the term "Congress supporters", but NEVER any religion. Second, If you say, i will check the article for neutrality, but whatever I say on gtalk or fb, are my personal opinions and i strongly want them to be never shared. Last, since you r on my list on various other sites, you can talk to me there since i am able to give my opinions in a better and easier way. And special thanks to MikeLynch who just explained the things, thanks for jaguaring my talk page. :P ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 10:42, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Happy Halloween!
Cheers! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 05:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Happy Halloween!
Happy Halloween! – Plarem (User talk contribs) 15:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Happy Halloween !!
Thanks a lot :) Wish u the same ! :) Sourav Mohanty (talk) 15:41, 31 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Wish u the same !!! -- Redtigerxyz  Talk 16:56, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Commander (Ping Me) 19:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 18:29, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Niranjan Bhagat
The VIAF and WorldCat link are dead. aηsuмaη  ༽Ϟ  05:34, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * WorldCat ✅ As of VIAF, problems seems to be with all articles, including FA Barack Obama. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 10:26, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * good, okay :) aηsuмaη   ༽Ϟ  10:33, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Impact of corruption on indian economy
I've re-added a speedy tag to this as it is a G12. You had previously removed a G12 tag as "sorry but content is released under CC". However not all CC licenses are compitable with wikipedia (see FAQ/Copyright). When I looked further I found the terms of service of the website which state "You must not change, edit, or reword any part of any article not written by you." This means that their licence isn't compatible with wikipedia as we require a licence that allows content to be changed. Dpmuk (talk) 13:19, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Impact of corruption on indian economy
You removed the speedy tag saying "sorry but content is released under CC". Unfortunately there are several CC licenses not all of which are compatible with Wikipedia. The terms of service of the source site, www.preservearticles.com, say "You must not change, edit, or reword any part of any article not written by you." This is not compatible with Wikipedia's much broader CC-BY-SA license which does allow modification. JohnCD (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * PS sorry to duplicate - I added this via the "new section" tag, and didn't see it has already been pointed out! JohnCD (talk) 14:49, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 14:50, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Excessively bitey
This was excessively bitey. Clearly, this was a new editor who was trying to create a new page and was having some difficulty. A gentler approach would have been to address the editor on their talk page and offer help, and a suggestion that they could develop the page in their userspace. Instead, you tagged the article within two minutes of its creation with six different deletion criteria, including blatant vandalism. This is the kind of thing that drives new editors away from Wikipedia. Please try to be more gentle in the future. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:47, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I though that this might be biting, but if you see this, it tells that user is seeming to test. If it would not been a biographical article, i would had not tagged this article, however i am trying to be gentler (i know all my tries r getting failed). Thanks for the help. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 13:52, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Fine, the editor was testing. New editors do that.  You have been warned before that tagging articles like this right after their creation is inappropriate -- give the user time to work out the kinks.  An article should only be deleted under WP:CSD if it has remained untouched for a while.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:55, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 16:15, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

 * Thanks a lot, its seems to be yummy! ;P ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 07:27, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 November2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Confirmtion
I am Vibhijain on prototype.wikimedia.org ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 11:58, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

English Wikipedia Internal Account Creation Interface
I confirm that I am signing up on English Wikipedia Internal Account Creation Interface under the username "Vibhijain". ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:11, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Article to work on... maybe?
This appeared at AfC - Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kuni Mulgi Deta Ka Mulgi - I suspect that the subject might be notable, but Google News finds nothing at all, and a straight Google search mostly turns up Facebook pages, blogs, and places to download the songs (none of which are reliable sources). But possibly this is just because I don't know where to look for information on Indian cinema. If you can find maybe one or two more independent reliable sources, tidy up the article a bit, and add basic information like expected release date, it could probably just about manage notability and make a nice little movie-related stub. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 13:34, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not an expert on Marathi cinema, but as per fb page, the film is releasing on December 2011. I will see if i can get some details from my marathi friends, or unless we can wait for some time so that the release date come near. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 15:09, 10 November 2011 (UTC)