User talk:Vibhijain/Archive 6

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:42, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 00:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry Can't Resist
Sorry for this non encyclopedic comment but today I was on your user page to steal a code and it is worth to just click on edit this page link and have a look at the whole page. I was unable to won any of your prize as I am not a good competitor.--Vyom25 (talk) 09:35, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikitable sorting
Hi, I see that you got List of Afghanistan T20I cricketers up to featured list status - it's a good article! I'm trying to get List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cornwall up to FL, but I was having trouble arranging the sortable table with multiple headings, as you have in your table. I've been having a go at arranging this in my sandbox, but the sortable columns are all still misplaced, even though I seem to have styled it the same way as your list. I was wondering if you have any suggestions, or be able to fix this? Thanks, Zangar (talk) 11:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mitt Romney
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mitt Romney. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 04:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 00:17, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Amber Heard
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Amber Heard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 21:15, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Rule 52 of the internet
– Plarem (User talk) 21:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 02:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

March 2012 Move-to-Commons drive
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Images and Media at 07:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC).

WikiCup 2012 February newsletter
Round 1 is already over! The 64 highest scorers have progressed to round 2. Our highest scorer was, again thanks mostly to a swathe of good articles on The X-Files. In second place was, thanks an impressive list of did you knows about racehorses. Both scored over 400 points. Following behind with over 300 points were, , and. February also saw the competition's first featured list: List of colleges and universities in North Dakota, from. At the other end of the scale, 11 points was enough to secure a place in this round, and some contestants with 10 points made it into the round on a tiebreaker. This is higher than the 8 points that were needed last year, but lower than the 20 points required the year before. The number of points required to progress to round 3 will be significantly higher.

The remaining contestants have been split into 8 pools of 8, named A through H. Round two will finish in two months time on 28 April, when the two highest scorers in each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers, will progress to round 3. The pools were entirely random, so while some pools may end up being more competitive than others, this is by chance rather than design.

The judges would like to point out two quick rules reminders. First, any content promoted during the interim period (that is, on or after 27 February) is eligible for points in round 2. Second, any content worked on significantly this year is eligible for points if promoted in this round. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which would otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk &bull; email) and The ed17 (talk &bull; email) 00:11, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

New Page Triage engagement strategy released
Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox -.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:45, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Film January–February newsletter
GRAPPLE  X  00:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Copyrights
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Copyrights. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 21:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 17:12, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

MOTDs (This space for rent)
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –p joe f (talk • contribs) 14:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks a lot. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 09:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello
Hey, how are you? -- Jagadhatri ২০১২ 07:05, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Just fine, since exams are over!! ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 10:00, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 22:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 12:55, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

HighBeam grants you full free access to HighBeam.com!
HighBeam Research is an online, paid search engine for newspapers, magazines, academic journals, newswires, trade magazines and encyclopedias. The site has access to over 80 million articles from 6,500 publications, most of which are not available for free elsewhere on the internet. Thousands of new articles are added daily, archives date back over 25 years including trade journal, newspaper articles, and peer-reviewed journals covering a wide range of subjects and industries; and there are tools for finding, saving, organizing, and sharing information as documents. Aside from a free 7-day trial (credit card required), access to HighBeam costs $30 per month or $200 per year for the first year and $300 for subsequent years. As of March 13, 2012 HighBeam has generouslly agreed to give free, full-access 1-year accounts for Wikipedia editors to use, at the discretion of the community. HighBeam is excited about this and does not expect there to be a shortage of these free, 1-year accounts; however, editors will have to have a 1 year-old account and 1000 edits in order to qualify for one. At the end of 1 year, editors who found the resource useful can simply re-apply. The current plan, although up for discussion, is for sign-ups for the accounts to begin on Monday April 2 at 10am EST and remain open until the following Monday; if there are more editors than accounts, to assign them randomly; if a surplus of accounts remain available, to re-open the sign-up page for regular additions. See WP:Highbeam for more details. Dipankan says.. ( "Be bold and edit!" ) 14:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Dipankan says.. ( "Be bold and edit!" ) 14:52, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

 * Some tasty bites are enough to make a day, and you have made my day. Yumm! ;) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 14:57, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, never mind. Have you read my email? If you do agree, then just send a reply back. Yes, I've lots of amazing newsletters and images of featured quality which I'd love to share with you. By the way, I'd love if you become an admin, why don't you nominate yourself? Dipankan says..  ( "Be bold and edit!" ) 15:01, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Please reply at the discussion here:, you may be interested. Dipankan says..  ( "Be bold and edit!" ) 08:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Is the song you created at your blog released under a free license? That was just toooooo good. Just wondering how you can do so well! Dipankan says..  ( "Be bold and edit!" ) 09:28, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Harbhajan Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Kingston, Ray Price, Colin Miller, Alistair Campbell and James Foster

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:41, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Howzat!

 * Thanks for it. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 18:06, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Danish Kaneria/archive1
Hi, instead of quick-failing this and archiving it (you already have another nomination that has yet to be supported, so only one nomination is allowed at this time), I've deleted it as a housekeeping move. Feel free to renominate it once your other nomination has sufficient support. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:19, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting m know that. Will take care of that next time. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 06:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Catch 22 on hatnotes, Requests for comment/Muhammad images
Hi Vibhijain, I just wanted to follow up on your comment about the functional hatnote. I'm a big advocate of the functional hatnote precisely because it makes it so much easier to defend NOTCENSORED if we gave readers the ability to read our articles without images.

It sounds like you're open to this idea in general, but you recognize the problems in doing it for just one article:


 * "There are several article on Wikipedia which effect a specific community or age group more than the Muhammad article. Such hatnotes should be bring into use in those articles first"

If you care about NOTCENSORED and want to protect it, you might reconsider a functional hat note. I won't debate which article "should" have been the first for us to bring it up.

We have a catch-22. At other pages, people say "Muhammad doesn't have a hatnote, neither should this page.". On this page, you say "Other stuff doesn't have a hatnote, Muhammad shouldn't".

If you like the idea of a hatnote in theory, you might support it here. I'm sure such a note could achieve consensus on pages other than this one, but this is the article Arbcom asked about, and that's the only reason it'd be first.

I feel like the only way to protect controversial images is to get SOME sort of a way for people to easily not see images. Until we have that, people can legitimately come to us and try to argue they we're needlessly offending them, and we have to give that serious consideration, because right now, there's no other option.

A simple hatnote on appropriate pages and we can sleep well knowing nobody 'has' to view images just to read an article. A very minor step, but one I'd be proud of. Right now, most users don't know how to view an imageless article.

Can't we find some way to add a short link to hide images somewhere at the top or sidebar? Even Western readers often want to read some articles without images, for example, when reading wikipedia in public.

It's easy to just say NOTCENSORED-- I know, I've said about Muhammad a lot :).  But there are tradeoffs.   If we don't put up a hatnote, we'll be under pressure to remove images outright.  Adding a "hide images on this page" button to the user interface really would end a HUGE dispute, and there's no reason it wouldn't work on in similar cases in the future.


 * ) That's my pitch.  See what ya think.   --HectorMoffet (talk) 08:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 14:48, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Non-admin closure undone
Hi, this is to inform you that I have undone your closure of Articles for deletion/List of Carnatic instrumentalists (2nd nomination) for the reasons detailed there.  Sandstein  20:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello!
Hi Vaibhav, my name is Aayush and I've only recently joined Wikipedia. I've been fairly active on articles that relate to Jainism and I chanced upon your page. You've got the userbox for a WikiProject Jainism Participant but your name wasn't mentioned in the list of participants for that project, otherwise I would've contacted you earlier! The number of editors working on Jain articles is pretty small and that of active editors is even smaller. I noticed you're an awesome editor and you've helped quite a few articles reach the GA status. Right now, WikiProject Jainism has only 2 FAs and 1 GA. I'd say we need to jack those numbers up a bit! So, I sincerely request you to pick out topics of your liking from the list of Jain articles and make them awesome! As always, if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask them and I will be sure to answer them. Hope to work with you on WikiProject Jainism! --Aayush18 (talk) 08:28, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Surely i will be willing to help you regarding Jainism articles. Although i on't have much knowledge of jainism (although i am a jain), i will help with other things like copy-editing an wikifying. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 08:49, 24 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Sounds good Vaibhav! And don't worry about your knowledge, no one here is an expert on Jainism. Being Jains, we all just know stuff and we learn more stuff as we start reading up things online. Do you need suggestions for articles to work on or would you be able to pick them out? --Aayush18 (talk) 17:29, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Tag and Assess 2012
Hi, Thanks a lot for participating in Tag and Assess 2012. Please add importance for the subprojects as well. ex. when megalaya=yes, the corresponding megalaya-importance also needs to be added. Ssriram mt (talk) 19:46, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Talbot Hobbs
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Talbot Hobbs. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 23:15, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Please Advise
Hi Vibhi ! No sources and references have been given for this article on an local Indian politician - Ram Kumar Walia. The NPOV seem to be suspect. Please advise. The guy seems to be using wikipedia for his own promotion. User:AkshaySeth20 (talk)AkshaySeth20 (talk)AkshaySeth20 (talk) 12:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I have ad some tags to the article. I think you should first of all remove all non-neutral things from the article. I you get stuck at any place, feel free to ping me. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 12:31, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

March Mini Wikfication Awards!


This WikiProject Wikify Ribbon is given to Vibhijain for wikifying 3 articles during the March Mini drive. Thankyou! ^^ benzband  ( talk ) 13:55, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 13:59, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Bhitargaon
Hi Vibhi !! How are you? Bhitargaon Temple, Kanpur is one of the oldest remaining hindu shrine in India. There is a page on Bhitargaon but nothing on the temple separately. Can we do something about this ? Thought you might be interested. Cheers ! AkshaySeth20 (talk) 11:53, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Create an another article on the temple, and in the Bhitargaon article, delete the Bhitargaon Temple section, and in the lead add "Bhitargaon Temple" in the last. I you have any doubts, feel free to ask. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 12:08, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

I dont know what to say
When I saw the MfD, i became still as if some psyco killer just appered in my bed romm with all windows locked. I looged off leaving my comment and opened FB and thought that it should not be deleted. I again came back to wiki and saw that you clossed it. I thought that such things last for days. I am not asking to reopen it, not at all :P but you really flattered me. Thanks!  Yash t  101  :)  13:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 01:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Danish Kaneria
Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:31, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Timeline of Rambhadracharya
Thanks from the wiki and me Victuallers (talk) 17:14, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello
Hi Vibhi !! I am making a series of edits to the article Ram Kumar. Can you check the article once and point out the errors and mistakes ? Thanks ! AkshaySeth20 (talk) 16:11, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 March newsletter
We are over half way through the second round of this year's WikiCup and things are going well! , of Pool B, is our highest overall scorer thanks to his prolific writings on television and film. In second place is Pool H's, thanks primarily to work on biological articles, especially in marine biology and herpetology. Third place goes to Pool E's, who also writes primarily on biology (including ornithology and botany) and has already submitted two featured articles this round. Of the 63 contestants remaining, 15 (just under a quarter) have over 100 points this round. However, 25 are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly. 32 contestants, the top two from each pool and the 16 next-highest scorers, will advance to round 3.

Congratulations to, whose impressive File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg became the competition's first featured picture. Also, congratulations to, who claimed good topic points, our first contestant this year to do so, for his work on Featured topics/1982 Atlantic hurricane season. This leaves featured topics and featured portals as the only sources of points not yet utilised. However, as recent statistics from show, no source has yet been utilised this competition to the same extent it has been previously!

It has been observed that the backlogs at good article candidates are building up again. While the points for good article reviews will be remaining constant, any help that can be offered keeping the backlog down would be appreciated. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk &bull; email) and The ed17 (talk &bull; email) 23:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)