User talk:Vic Till

October 2012
Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Farrell Till, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, IronGargoyle (talk) 16:37, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Farrell Till was changed by Vic Till (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910478 on 2012-10-09T16:44:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:44, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, Vic Till. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Farrell Till, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)


 * You are not an acceptable reference for the article. Please see our policy on reliable sources. Furthermore, you should generally avoid editing articles for which you have a close personal connection. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:56, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

COI
This is to repeat and underscore the above warnings re: conflict of interest--your recent changes, including the addition of non-notable family members, are not improvements. Thank you, 76.248.149.47 (talk) 01:43, 15 October 2012 (UTC)