User talk:Vicky510

Nice work!
Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Vicky510 (talk) 00:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm Torritorri. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to University of California, Irvine School of Social Sciences seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You may also find this Wikipedia essay helpful. TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 09:48, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to University of California, Irvine School of Social Sciences does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 08:02, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at University of California, Irvine School of Social Sciences. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

''Rather than continuing to violate this policy, I strongly urge you to join the discussion on the above article's talk page. I'd suggest you cease adding material substantially similar to your previous edits until a consensus is reached in that discussion.'' TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 05:35, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on University of California, Irvine School of Social Sciences. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 02:23, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.