User talk:Vicky megh

Welcome!
Hello, Vicky megh, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Meghwal, have removed content without a valid reason. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 09:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Meghwal
Hi, I have reverted you at Meghwal because the information that you removed appeared to be reliably sourced. You cannot just remove something like that because you think or know otherwise - that would be original research. What you will have to do is find other sources that contradict the one that is currently used and/or explain at Talk:Meghwal why it is that the current source is not in fact reliable. Hope this helps. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 09:10, 31 March 2015 (UTC)


 * You have removed the information again. I am sorry but you really cannot do this without following the guidance that I gave you earlier above. I have reinstated the material for now. - Sitush (talk) 11:32, 31 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, the consensus of the English Wikipedia community is that the Joshua Project - a Christian evangelist organisation - is not a reliable source for our articles. Thus, yet again, I have had to revert you.


 * I appreciate that this must all be extremely frustrating. It might be better if you discuss any proposed changes at Talk:Meghwal before actually making them. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 18:22, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Your recent editing history at Meghwal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''

Please can you revert your last change at Meghwal and follow the advice that I gave you in previous messages here. Failure to do so may lead to you being blocked from contributing and will make no long-term difference to the article.'' Sitush (talk) 01:27, 1 April 2015 (UTC)


 * You didn't, so I have. The information is reliably sourced. Please take note of the information below. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 04:18, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Meghwal. Sitush (talk) 18:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)


 * And you have just done it again! Are you going to stop and discuss or just continue your disruptive behaviour? - Sitush (talk) 13:09, 25 April 2015 (UTC)


 * And again! Why do you keep removing reliably sourced information and inserting stuff that is much less so. Please confirm that you have read WP:V, WP:RS and WP:NPOV. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 13:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)