User talk:Vicmangino

Re:AVETeC
Dear Mr. Mangino: Thank you for letting me know your concerns. The reason that the AVETeC article was deleted is not that the name infringed on the trademarks of any other company, it's that the text of the article itself was a direct copy of text that already existed on your web page. This is considered a copyright violation by this criterion (see #8). If you would like the Wikipedia article to have the same text as the web page, you must first be the copyright holder of the text, then you must inform Wikipedia that you are giving permission of fair use. You would let Wikipedia Public Relations know, by following the instructions here. Then it will be made clear in the Wikipedia article's talk page that you are the copyright holder of the text. If you aren't the copyright holder, you can get permission from the copyright holder to licence the work. Again, if permission is granted, this fact must be made known to Wikipedia PR as above.

Alternately, you could re-write the article so that it's not infringing on any copyright, and making sure that you assert the notability of AVETeC.

I hope this clears up the issue. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask on my talk page. ... disco spinster   talk  16:01, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop
You have recently re-created the article AVETeC, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. Gl e n 17:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


 * See our speedy deletion criteria specifically #11. I also recommend you read our notability policy. Finally, do not blank other users talk pages, it is considered vandalism. Gl e n 17:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)