User talk:Victor B Smith

Welcome! Hello, Victor B Smith, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksmiletris.png|23px]]  Introduction
 * [[Image:C05.png|23px]]  The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * [[Image:Crystal package utilities.png|23px]]  How to edit a page
 * [[Image:Crystal khelpcenter.png|23px]]  Help
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksokoban.png|23px]]  How to write a great article'''
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app kedit.png|23px]]  Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there.

Lord Kestenbaum
There are a few problems with your edits at Jonathan Kestenbaum, Baron Kestenbaum: I realise you are new and am not accusing you of anything. Feel free to leave a message at my talk page if you have any questions. -Rrius (talk) 08:08, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * You are removing information without any explanation whatsoever.
 * You are changing information, such as his doing post-grad work at Cambridge, that came from a source without providing any reference for your information.
 * You are making huge deletions of text and marking them as minor. Only truly minor and non-controversial edits, such as grammatical, spelling, and punctuation fixes, should be marked as minor.
 * You are making changes that violate Wikipedia's Manual of Style, which I would recommend reviewing.
 * You are removing "Labour" from the lead section when that is included for most legislators around the world.
 * You are removing NESTA from the lead when that is something he is particularly known for and adding his private business role when that is something he is not. The lead should serve as an introduction to the subject, not a summary of what he is currently doing.
 * You are making these changes after having been reverted, but not taking it up at the article's the article's talk page (which you can do by clicking the "discussion" tab next to the "Article" tab).