User talk:Victor Lopes/2010 (October–December)

Brazil and weapons of mass destruction
Hi Victor! The article Brazil and weapons of mass destruction was nominated for deletion by User:AlexCovarrubias. Could you please leave an opinion here? Obrigado. Limongi (talk) 02:04, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Edifício São Vito article was stubified after AfD
The Edifício São Vito article was nominated for deletion in early August 2010. The result was to keep the article and stubify it. I do not think that the article should have even been stubified, though. If someone would have just cleaned up the machine translations aomehow. My earlier machine translation of the article is very low-quality and may possibly violate general policy, so I ask you to please provide a complete translation of the Portuguese version of the Sao Vito article yourself. Include all the specific details, the history, its deterioration over the years, vacancy, and future demolition while you are at it. Jim856796 (talk) 02:57, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Masters Athletics World Records
I don't know what you are doing, maybe it is because I don't know what I am doing relative to WP format. But you aren't helping, whatever you are doing. You just undid a newly created special page. I even specified why I was creating it. You then put a redirect onto the main page that turned it into an endless loop of duplication. Please be more analytical before you trash someone's work. If you have a better suggestion on how to format this kind of detail, then lets talk before you damage the work that is already functioning. Trackinfo (talk) 23:52, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Before you keep placing a redirect, please read what is causing it to appear there. In the time you have rapidly edited what I have done, you couldn't possibly have looked at the source code.  Its there for a reason.  Stop reverting and I'll be happy to talk about what I'm doing in a sane fashion. Trackinfo (talk) 23:57, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * OK. The data is NOT found on that page.  These small pages are creating the table that fits into that line on the page.  I've got to do one of these layouts for each multi-event score, unless you have a better idea.  Here is the problem.  Decathlon (and heptathlon and pentathlon) scores, unlike all the other Track and Field events that are on this page, are composed of the results of ten different events.  You can see we already have the cumulative point total on the page for the other performers.  The new page allows us to show the ten component events in an organized table form that fits into the overall results.  I don't know what its called, but you'll find a redirect code in each of these lines  to drop the table page into the line.  When you put a redirect on the table page, you screw it up by pasting the entire main page back in to that line.  Now, since I assume you are on new page patrol and are an experienced editor, if you have a better idea on how to lay out two vertical lines of ten columns into a colspan defined area, please pass it along.  After getting this to finally work, I need to take a break anyhow.  Now that the page looks like it should, I won't make any more of these for a little while.  You've got time to explain a better solution. Trackinfo (talk) 00:12, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I've been playing with this all afternoon. I know how to do this layout in straight html (a table within a table), but its going to take a more experienced editor to change that into wiki format and keep it in one page.  By the way, the page is over 100K so I'm getting auto-warnings about size.  Currently this is the best look I could come up with to cleanly present this information.  If you have that level of knowledge or can direct someone who has that knowledge to the page, search for those first three special characters and you'll see what is there.  It took me deciphering how others do this stuff--I learn by copying other people's formatting--to figure out those characters.  Out of 100K of code, you won't find it in a hurry. Trackinfo (talk) 00:33, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Eneme (Rapper)‎
i have chosen this article because to provide publicity entertainment for music, and for publicity entertainment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eneme (Rapper) (talk • contribs) 00:16, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Moulin Rouge (band)
Hello. Please re-evaluate your suggestion to delete Moulin Rouge (band). They were a significant part of the European electronic music scene in the 1980s. The article now has a nice foundation, in my opinion. Vlanko (talk) 02:48, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Voice Commerce Group for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Voice Commerce Group, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Voice Commerce Group until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Victorian Mutant (Talk) 09:53, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Re:About a picture of yours
Thank you for having alerted me. It's a good spur to keep uploading photo knowing that somebody could use it and appreciate it. Thank you also for the credits, very very appreciated! Bye --Luckyz (talk) 21:11, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Robert Pope
I know you're on vacation, but if you have a chance to pop in here, please do. You seem to have done much of the writing on the Pope article, and I thought you should be made aware of the deletion debate. I think there is enough material out there on Pope to better source the article. What do you think? Qworty (talk) 00:34, 31 December 2010 (UTC)