User talk:Victor Lopes/2020

I hoped you don't angry
hello there Victor, I just wanna letting you know that I submit your draft article on your behalf, I hoped you don't angry at me

--the special girl is me (talk) 06:13, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove table captions
See MOS:TABLECAPTION and track listing, re: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MMXX_%28album%29&type=revision&diff=951448493&oldid=951431950 ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:13, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Francesco for Moonglow (album)
Hi, I'm Francesco. I replied on my talk page about Moonglow (album) info. Kekkofranco~enwiki (talk) 17:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Rene
Hello Victor do you have an instagram or twitter account? I'm René "Residente" and you are editing my real info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.41.137.226 (talk) 07:41, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello, the only edit I recently made on Residente was one that reverted an unexplained removal of information and an unsourced addition about a marriage Victor Lopes  Fala! • C 15:05, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Your article Presente (album)
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Presente (album) to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Please ensure everything is in English, including citation dates or it throws errors. Bakertheacre Chat/My Contibutions 17:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * What you just did is borderline disruptive. The article was created less than two hours ago. You could have held your horses while I do all the necessary fixes (like I always do, as anyone can see in my contribs) instead of throwing this awkward DTTR here. You couldn't even accurately identify the original language. Spanish? Really? Victor Lopes  Fala! • C 17:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * - I apologize you see this as disruptive. I only know English and the knowledge that all articles are to be in English. It came up with errors because as you created it, you did not change the dates correctly to the required template parameters. I just looked at the DISRUPTSIGNS and I do not see how it is even borderline as the references all show in red and the references you list show as [6]. As far as the language, I do not feel that matters, as I said, I only speak English. Someone did come through and fix it. As far as WP:DTTR I have reveiwed it and will be more careful in the future, however, your behavior is definitely on WP:Bite which I do not appreciate, especially since this is a WP:GF edit. Have a great day!Bakertheacre Chat/My Contibutions 17:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I apologize if you took it as me biting you. Of course I realize articles must be in English, but I translated that one using the Content Translation tool, which makes our job easier, but does have some bugs - one of them is the inability to properly translate references from Portuguese to English. Sometimes it doesn't even recognize them, as it happens with sfn refs, which is why we had those [1], [2], etc. Fixes must be done manually, and I always do them as soon as possible.
 * Also, I removed the tags you added because you didn't specify which parts or words you believe are POV/peacock. The article is written in the same tone I have been using and seeing in hundreds of pages for pretty much a decade and hardly ever have people considered them inappropriate (and when they do, it's always regarding specific passages, and not the whole pages). If you could be more specific here or on the article talk page, I'd appreciate it. Victor Lopes  Fala! • C 18:39, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, I removed the tags you added because you didn't specify which parts or words you believe are POV/peacock. The article is written in the same tone I have been using and seeing in hundreds of pages for pretty much a decade and hardly ever have people considered them inappropriate (and when they do, it's always regarding specific passages, and not the whole pages). If you could be more specific here or on the article talk page, I'd appreciate it. Victor Lopes  Fala! • C 18:39, 6 July 2020 (UTC)


 * No worries. We are good. I’m pretty sure you know more of what you are doing than I do :) Bakertheacre Chat/My Contibutions 18:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Beautiful songs by men Htb.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Beautiful songs by men Htb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Overlinking
Hi, thanks for your contributions. Please note our guidelines on linking. Here's a recent edit of an article you created. Tony (talk)  00:13, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for the welcome message and the links, they will be super helpful. Bruno (talk) 20:24, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Pernambuco
Hello Victor I still consider myself new, although I have been working on the History of Pernambuco page since September. I recently got up to 1970 and stopped as I had run out of references (and going to an academic library is going to be possible only after Covid-19 is tamed). I was looking at the Pernambuco article and, while I realize you are focused on geography and not History, for lack of finding anyone who seems to be working on Pernambuco (or even History of Brazil). I wanted to solicit any guidance you would give about how detailed the History section in the Pernambuco article should be, especially since I have been fairly long in the History of Pernambuco article. Thanks P2dwight (talk) 18:51, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , first of all, congratulations on your hard work! As for the section, it's hard to tell, I mean, I don't think there's any kind of ideal size. I think that the last three sub-sections (Dutch conquest, Jewish immigration and Portuguese Reconquest) could be a bit shorter, and that some additional paragraphs about the state during the 19th and 20th centuries (especially some explaining how it became an economic and political force in the Northeast, etc) should be added. Victor Lopes  Fala! • C 17:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)