User talk:Victorbomfim13

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at São Paulo–Guarulhos International Airport. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 23:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at São Paulo–Guarulhos International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. It is obvious that you do not understand how Wikipedia works. Please try to equip yourself by using the help button on the left. HkCaGu (talk) 07:46, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at São Paulo–Guarulhos International Airport, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HkCaGu (talk) 16:35, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Edit war on São Paulo–Guarulhos International Airport ‎
Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on São Paulo–Guarulhos International Airport ‎.

While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.

If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.

If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.

Continued edit warring on São Paulo–Guarulhos International Airport ‎ or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 16:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing and edit warring. The purpose of this block is not to discourage you from editing but rather to make sure you are aware of basic policies such as the need for reliable sources to back up any changes you make, especially if those changes are challenged by others. "I live in Brazil" doesn't cut it. We do not allow original research here, if we did everyone could just write what they think is correct and this would just be a big fat mess. This is very basic stuff that new users should understand before diving in.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC)