User talk:VictoriaEatsBallz

September 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Stephen Rannazzisi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stephen Rannazzisi was changed by VictoriaEatsBallz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964607 on 2015-09-27T17:24:11+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen Rannazzisi, you may be blocked from editing. Neil N  talk to me 17:28, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Stephen Rannazzisi. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 17:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

The article is not there to "help" the subject. It is there to document their life, both as an actor and a person. --Neil N  talk to me 17:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)