User talk:Victoriamelody

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Victoria Melody- Still from Stress Ball Performance.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Stress1.jpg. The copy called Image:Stress1.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:15, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Stress-Ball.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stress-Ball.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 15:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Victoria Melody- Still from Stress Ball Performance.jpg
If this is an images you are the creator of, or the copyright holder for please say so in the image usmmary or the image may be deleted. Wikipedia gets so many images uploaded, that information on the source and copyright status is essential. Sfan00 IMG 15:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Victoria Melody- Still from Stress Ball Performance.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Victoria Melody- Still from Stress Ball Performance.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Potential copyright violation
Hi. Thank you for creating the Victoria melody page. Unfortunately, part of the content appears to be directly taken from http://protoplay.net/?page_id=12.

On the surface, this appears to be in breach of Wikipedia's copyright rules.

However:
 * I notice your username is the same as the article subject. This might suggest that you are Victoria Melody, in which case it is also possible that you are the copyright holder of the text on protoplay.net. If you are the copyright holder, please indicate this on the talk page of the article and the text will probably be able to be restored.


 * It may also be that the original content is not copyright at all - the protoplay homepage does not include a copyright tag. If you know this to be so, please indicate this on the article talk page (this will likely also require third-party proof such as an email from protoplay to this effect).


 * A third option would be for someone who is knowledgeable about the subject to rewrite the copyright text in theri own words, and repost it. If you are the person in question, this should be an easy task.

Once again, thank you for creating the article. Please don't think that the removal of this text implies any disrespect to the article subject, just that Wikipedia has strict copyright rules and it is better to be safe than sorry. Euryalus 07:14, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Victoria Melody
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Victoria Melody, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Victoria Melody. andy (talk) 23:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)