User talk:VictorianChild

Welcome!


Hello, VictorianChild, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who put a certain post on a talk page. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * New contributors' help page | Help
 * Where to ask questions | Frequently asked questions
 * Introduction to Wikipedia | Guide to Wikipedia
 * The simplified ruleset for Wikipedia | Manual of Style
 * Things to work on at Wikipedia
 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out Questions, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! —Ute in DC (talk) 06:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your input on Charlotte Elizabeth Tonna
Thanks for your updates!

I made a small change to our edit. Based on her bibliography, Tonna is more notable as a evangelicist and as a poet than as a children's writer, so I (re-) added these to her "genres."

We have another small discrepancy: She is listed as a "Victorian author." However, she died less than five year after the beginning of Victoria's reign, and almost all of her work was written prior to Victoria's reign. I'm not sure that Tonna qualifies as "Victorian." Comment? -Arch dude (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * That's cool. I'm new to wikipedia and for now most of my editing is just based on conformity rather than 'researching' or 'accuracy', but those two will come in time once I get settled. When I joined a few days ago Tonna was already listed as a Victorian so I just used that even though it seemed weird. In comparison to another writer already listed (Barbauld), I actually made a comment on how she died over 10 years before Victoria's reign?!
 * For now, I'm just trying to bring conformity in the layout of all the people in the template. As you can see, I'm not actually spending too much time on each person rather I'm trying to unify the Victorians as best I can. It's kinda tricky. I'm noticing lots of confusing technicalities, Tonna, for example, in the article is Protestant while her categories are Anglican? Genres versus Themes? Novelist vs Writer vs Author? Also, lots of the place names have changed so I have to go by historic English countries and Imperial names of countries.
 * VictorianChild (talk) 03:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Infoboxes
Hi VictorianChild - a lot of the Victorian illustrator pages don't have infoboxes for a reason. I don't know if you're aware, but infoboxes are not mandatory, and often considered quite unsightly. You might want to have a look at WP:DISINFOBOX. At the least the image should be integrated in the infobox. Just thought you might be interested. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 20:51, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, no real need in really small articles or articles without the picture of the illustrator. I can understand how they can be "unsightly" in that sense, but overall, I don't see how. Anyways, I realized the disinfoboxes effect in the articles of Dalziel, Hall, Millar, and Rackham. Those could be removed no problem. If the case is "Disinfoboxes are infobox templates which add no value to articles." (WP:DISINFO) then it's very counter-intuitive for most infoboxes I see contain the information in the first paragraph of the article and the beginning and ending info in the biography section. I would think, by definition, the infobox is always redundant. A good example would be Lewis Carroll, despite the length of the article, the intro paragraph is basically the infobox in word form. Btw, I didn't make that box.VictorianChild (talk) 21:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 22:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)