User talk:VictorianDream17

August 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in List of Filipino inventions and discoveries, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;talk 07:03, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Filipino inventions and discoveries, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 01:20, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of Filipino inventions and discoveries, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please stop removing info stating misinformation on supposed Filipino inventions which are backed by reliable sources. I have dealt with behavior with other users advancing a pro-China POV in another article before so accusation of having "ulterior motive" is of bad faith and baseless.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:44, 5 April 2022 (UTC)'' Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:44, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of Filipino inventions and discoveries. Sunmist (talk) 02:08, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I hadn't read my messages but regardless I wouldn't want to stay with such biased, unreliable source of information. There is no need to both leave out disputed accomplishments in the main sections and then on top of that add a mockingly written article questioning the accomplishments that were never credited.  Good riddance! VictorianDream17 (talk) 20:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Late reply. But just in case. It would be more helpful if you point out parts that you feel are biased instead of calling users baseless names and ad hominems. If that's about having a separate section for urban legend, imo is apt but please do point out why it's not. And there was never intention on my part to present such info mockingly. Like if you find the certain UP faculty calling a yoyo a toy as offensive then I'm just quoting him verbatim.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 23:51, 13 June 2022 (UTC)