User talk:VictoryBrewing

December 2018
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Black Kite (talk) 20:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Kotaku article: "far-left"
You edited the lead section of the Kotaku article to state that they are a "far-left" outlet, citing in your edit summary that they made this information clear; it would be much appreciated if you would find a reference for this statement, as I was unable to. The change has been reverted for the time being, but you are welcome to reintroduce it if you can find a source. goose121 (talk) 20:15, 10 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The source cited says that they are "center-left", which is clearly a distinct category from "far-left". goose121 (talk) 20:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Kotaku. -- ferret (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Louis Farrakhan
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Louis Farrakhan. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 01:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC)


 * You are at the three-revert limit at Kotaku; any further reverts would be grounds for your account to be blocked without further warning. —C.Fred (talk) 01:24, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  01:27, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Unblock

 * I thanked the administrator who declined your unblock request for defending me against your ongoing personal attacks. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  07:26, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I endorse the block, for what its worth. I almost issued it myself but gave one more chance. -- ferret (talk) 12:54, 11 December 2018 (UTC)