User talk:Viejito311

Your edit to All Headline News
Your recent edit to All Headline News (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Information provided to Wikipedia by user Viejito311 in shows that Viejito311 is solely interested in discrediting the organization as Viejeo311 is employed at a competitive organization. Viejito311 posts have bee slanderous, libelous and defamatory in nature and posted in the veil of perceived online anonymity. This is not the behavior of ethical journalism and calls to question the veracity, ethics, morality and scruples of Viejito311. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eventus (talk • contribs)
 * Other than the reverted page blanking, Viejito311 has not been vandalizing. This matter of All Headline News belongs on the talk page of the article, and should remain on the talk page of the article - there is no need to call anyone here a vandal. My apologies for all the confusion. Happy editing. -- Jay  (Reply)  23:23, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Discussion in talk page should not revert to libel, slander or defamatory comments. Please cite verifiable legal cases before making accusations about alleged activity of criminal and civil nature. Previous comments made by Viejito311 else where on Wikipedia make it appear that you are attempting to harm the subject of the posting while trying to hide behind the veil annonymity.User:Eventus