User talk:Viewrais

July 2015
Hello, I'm Ogress. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Slow cooker because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ogress smash! 23:09, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Existential risk from artificial ignorance


The article Existential risk from artificial ignorance has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * seems to be more an essay with a lot of original research rather than an article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ©Geni (talk) 02:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Existential risk from artificial ignorance
Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Viewrais, thanks for creating Existential risk from artificial ignorance!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I'm not convinced that the term artificial ignorance is in common use, or has a clear definition. Your article reads like an essay. I think that you may have intended the links you have added to be references. Please see [WP:CITE.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 17:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)