User talk:Vigilant awareness

Re: Jenn Comerford
I have nominated this page for speedy deletion, because it appears that the article qualifies as an attack page. You may contest the speedy deletion by typing in the article. You should not remove a speedy deletion tag from an article that you have written. Please understand that repeatedly adding attack pages is grounds to be blocked. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  20:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi, I see you removed the speedy deletion tag while I left you this note. As I mentioned, this is not in accordance with policy. I'm going to restore the tag, but I will also place the tag to show that you disagree with the speedy deletion. Feel free to leave me a message here or at my talk page if you need to discuss this or have a question. Xymmax  So let it be written   So let it be done  20:37, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The reason I'm insisting on adding this tag is that your article seems to cast a real person in a negative light. Wikipedia has a very strict policy about this called biographies of living persons. Basically, you need reliable sources to back any negative information about living people, and even writing about guilty pleas or and community service without proof qualifies. Otherwise, I would not interfere with your efforts to write an article. I hope you understand. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  20:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I must admit I am new to authoring articles in Wikipedia. When I edited the article I saw things in the text that I did not put there, and so deleted them. I can understand why you might perceive this to be an attack article, and I should have left it until it was finished to submit the article - I'm still getting to know my way around! I think you'll find the finished product much more balanced. I look forward to your feedback when I post it.--Vigilant awareness (talk) 21:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jenn Comerford
I have deleted the article. As it stands, it is a mostly unsourced article that portrays an apparently non-notable person in a negative light. Please review Wikipedia's policy for biographis of living persons. This article fails the BLP requirements by a significant margin.  Acroterion  (talk)  22:20, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

I renominated the page for deletion for the same reasons as above. There isn't anything in the article which says why she is notable. In addition, in biographies of living persons it is very important to have reliable sources for any contentious material, which this article does not appear to have. --Megaboz (talk) 22:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Please read, understand, and employ Wikipedia's policies for verifiability, formatting references and citations, notability and biographies. A further re-posting of the article as it stands will result in a block.  Interviews with the subject do not constitute appropriate sourcing, and you have not shown that the person in question is notable. The standards for negative biographies of individuals are clear and demanding.   Acroterion  (talk)  22:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
 * Please use the time you are blocked to read and understand the policies described above.   Acroterion  (talk)  23:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)