User talk:VigoDeutschendorf

Wikipedia:Notability edits
This note (verbitim) is going to User:VigoDeutschendorf and to User:Tom harrison &amp; User:MONGO: Yesterday's borderline edit-war was rather unnecessary. Vigo: please discuss major changes (like adding entire sections) before making them, especially to a (contentious!) guideline/policy page. You appear to be a new Wikipedian judging from your Contributions page, so your overenthusiasm is understandable. Tom and Mongo: It's not really fair to Vigo (or everyone, for that matter) to revert someone's work without a reasoned and detailed explanation for why in the edit summary or the Talk page, especially if you were not part of the ongoing Talk discussion about the direction of the guideline page in question in the first place. FYI, Vigo's ideas have been integrated (albeit in different working) by two heavily-involved editors on this topic, and fit well with the overall direction of the new "Misconceptions" section. This is not meant as a flame against anyone (nor even to everyone equally &gt;;-) but a process-enhancing/consensus-building request. Notability has been one of the most debatory issues on all of WP, and it's really nice to get some progress on consensus happening. &mdash; SMcCandlish &#91;talk&#93; &#91;contrib&#93; ツ 10:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)