User talk:Vijayaivalli

February 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Veeranna Aivalli was changed by Vijayaivalli (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858899 on 2013-02-27T18:00:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:00, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ten Village Group
Hello, Vijayaivalli. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ten Village Group, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Atlantima (talk) 03:19, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Judging from your edit summary "Content that was in first tense is removed and made in it third tense to make it acceptable to Wiki rules. No reference to Facebook. Also this group is public group and not an individuals domain." it seems like you don't adequately understand the reasons that deletion was proposed. It's okay. Wikipedia policies can seem confusing to new users. You are correct that third-person tense is preferred in Wikipedia articles, but this is not the problem. According to guidelines (Notability (organizations and companies)), "Ten Village Group" should only have an article on Wikipedia if it has received significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Otherwise it is not notable and does not merit an article. The type of group it is has nothing to do with it. Additionally, you appear to be the spokesperson for the group in question. Best practices for editors with close associations suggests that editors "Avoid creating new articles about yourself or your organization." For more information I suggest that you read Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and FAQ/Organizations. Hope this clears things up for you :) --Atlantima (talk) 20:57, 28 March 2013 (UTC)