User talk:Vijaysehgal

Notability issues
Although I need to do some online research, I'm skeptical whether Hans Raj Dhall meets Wkipedia's notability requirements. Inline citations (footnotes) are necessary for verifying facts; the subject needs to have been covered in independent media. As it currently stands, the article looks like a vanity or promotional piece. Without independent sourcing, it will be deleted in accordance with Wikipedia policy. Please read WP:BIO for requirements and update the article with proper sourcing. Thank you Vesuvius Dogg (talk) 15:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Mahashay Dharampal Gulati
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mahashay Dharampal Gulati, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://mdhspices.com/mdh-mahashaya-ji/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hans Raj Dhall


A tag has been placed on Hans Raj Dhall, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Safiel (talk) 17:34, 1 January 2016 (UTC)