User talk:VijeshthesonofGod

Speedy deletion nomination of Vijesh Sungkur


A tag has been placed on Vijesh Sungkur, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  18:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC) This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, VijeshthesonofGod, does not meet our username policy. '''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).''' A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

deletion
Hi, I blocked this user name because some might find it offensive. I deleted your recent article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have references.

If this guy is notable, it should be easy to find genuinely independent sources (follow the link above so see what this means. Because you have not given sources or linked to other articles, we don't know the significance of eg the "Winning The Lost ministry.", Sanada Sungkur.

The tone of the article is unencyclopaedic and spammy, eg God Jesus and Lord fully capitalised, the "gift of tongues" given as a fact without reference to an independent non-religious source. Why is his unsourced early life headed "Fall" that's pov. His conversion is presented as fact, but no sources. Then the power of GOD filled the room presented as a fact, no independent evidence. likewise All of the boys received the gifts of tongues

Ministry section is pure spam, this holy night where GOD visited the boys in that room, many healing took place by the power of GOD, and the power of GOD was so great in this Church. etc Coincidence presented as "Prophecies"

This article is preaching, not giving an encyclopaedia's objective view. It's all pov religious stuff with no independently sourced content  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:48, 25 March 2011 (UTC)