User talk:VikasBaniya

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacob Cass


A tag has been placed on Jacob Cass, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Please read the template's instructions. It clearly says "If this article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message."So, if you wish to contest the speedy deletion, click on the "Contest this speedy deletion" (the blue button in the middle) and follow the instruction in the editing window that opens. It would also help if you could explain how the version you created addresses the concerns raised in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Cass which led to the article being deleted by adminstrator as a result of that discussion. You might also consider trying Wikipedia:Deletion review if you feel the article deserves to be recnonsidered for inclusion rather than just symply recreating it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:25, 13 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Ok. Thanks. I have contested. --VikasBaniya (talk) 12:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Jacob Cass) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Jacob Cass, VikasBaniya!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"I have declined the CSD because having reviewed the deleted aterial I find few similarities. The subject is the same but the twomarticaes are sustantially different. Feel free to use another criterion."

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Champa Devi Pawle) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Champa Devi Pawle, VikasBaniya!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Can you please include the country where this is taking place? Pleaae remember that this is the EnglishWikipedia."

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacob Cass


A tag has been placed on Jacob Cass, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Blythwood (talk) 04:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Cut-and-paste move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Battle off Barbados a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Battle of Barbados. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk,  contribs ) 19:34, 31 December 2016 (UTC)