User talk:Vikramkumar81

October 2018
Hello, I'm Daiyusha. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Bhagalpur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Daiyusha (talk) 07:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bhagalpur, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Please give proof for what you are editing '' Daiyusha (talk) 08:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If you need a place to experiment or to create a draft you can always use your sandbox. This will allow you to create the section you want to add to Bhagalpur then go find all the reliable sources you need and properly cite them. Once you have properly cited the information then you can integrate your draft back into the article. If you keep reverting reviewers who are declining your edits because of no/unverifiable sources you could potentially violate WP:3RR policy.  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  08:35, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamia Imam E Aazam


A tag has been placed on Jamia Imam E Aazam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Ravensfire  (talk) 17:33, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Vikramkumar81! Thank you for your contributions. I am Dreamy Jazz and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 23:15, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Speedy deletion nomination of Sain Martin


A tag has been placed on Sain Martin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. PlotHelpful (talk) 11:46, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Copyright Issues
Hello Vikramkumar81,

An article you recently created Sandeep Aggarwal has copyright issues in the first and second paragraph. I have taken the liberty to remove the introductory and replace with something shorter. Feel free to re-write that section again. Happy editing. PlotHelpful (talk) 12:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Nisha Pandey) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Nisha Pandey.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Thanks for your new article on Nisha Pandey. Other editors have noted that the article needs more sources to verify the statements made about her career, and to provide more evidence that she is notable. Without this type of evidence, other editors could recommend that the article be deleted.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 18:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Private company limited by shares. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 06:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nisha Pandey


A tag has been placed on Nisha Pandey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"A7, G3 - copypasted lead and sources from Ravi Kishan (lead is complete fake), the rest seems to describe a non-notable artist (per Google zero evidence of notability)"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GermanJoe (talk) 10:13, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Goods and Services Tax (India), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.  GermanJoe (talk) 10:33, 15 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Please also read WP:COI and WP:PAID, and disclose a conflict of interest as paid editor. Editing without such a disclosure violates WMF's Terms of Use for this website. GermanJoe (talk) 11:10, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Sandeep Aggarwal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandeep Aggarwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sandeep Aggarwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GermanJoe (talk) 11:05, 15 January 2019 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 11:20, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

talk


 * Are you rejecting the opportunity I provided you above, to be unblocked? If so, please explicitly state that you are unwilling to follow those steps to be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 11:57, 17 January 2019 (UTC)


 * No I am not rejecting the opportunity, I am just asking some process, Yamla9

Materialscientist (talk)

The steps provided need to be followed before you are unblocked; they are not meant to be a process you simply agree to. 331dot (talk) 12:41, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Materialscientist (talk)

Materialscientist (talk)