User talk:Vikramsinghdafauti

Welcome!
Hello, Vikramsinghdafauti, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Govardhana matha does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   18:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

February 2018
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Sringeri Sharada Peetham, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:59, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Govardhana matha, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. 483 BCE is nonsense; youtube is not WP:RS; we don't place refrences within the brackets used to create a link, etc.  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   05:12, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sringeri Sharada Peetham. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   05:13, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Dating of Shankara
Hi Vikramsinghdafauti. I know that the Advaita tradition situats Shankara in the 5th century BCE, but that's not the scholarly point of view. At best, you can add a statement in thise article that "According to the Advaita Vedanta traition, Adi Shankara lived in the 5th century BCE." Best regards,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   07:59, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Your addition to Govardhana matha has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:40, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

I have also removed copyright content you added to your user page. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)