User talk:Vikrant A Phadkay

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has since been deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. —Whomp t/c  21:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Context missing
Some of your contributions - Other Army Actions, SSG Disaster, Battle of Chawinda and Phillora - provide no context. They do not even mention what conflict you are writing about. Links in other pages are not enough - Skysmith 12:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

SSG Disaster
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the SSG Disaster article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Tonywalton | Talk 12:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Other Army Actions
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Other Army Actions article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Tonywalton | Talk 12:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

SSG Disaster
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as SSG Disaster, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://vayu-sena.tripod.com/1965-ssg1.html, and therefore a copyright violation. SSG Disaster has been nominated for deletion.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:SSG Disaster. Then you should do one of the following:
 * Make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL at the site of the original publication.
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions at wikimedia dot org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation.

If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at SSG Disaster, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Garion96 (talk) 13:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

List of greatest tyrants in world history
I have listed this article for deletion because I believe it does not comply with Wikipedia's policy on neutrality. The discussion page is here: Articles for deletion/List of greatest tyrants in world history. Slac speak up! 23:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * You are not permitted to remove the deletion discussion notice before the discussion has concluded. Please visit the discussion page if you believe the article should not be deleted and explain why. Slac speak up! 12:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during August 27 2006 (UTC) to Articles for deletion/James Rhine
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. talk to JD wants e-mail 12:19, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edits at Adolf Hitler
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to Adolf Hitler, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Also, make sure to use an informative edit summary for such edits. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. K8TEK 15:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Please note that edits at well-developed articles such as Adolf Hitler must either be reverting recent vandalism/recent bad edits or you really have to study the subject seriously and do quite a lot of effort to further improve the article. Removing a well-referenced section such as you did without explanation makes no sense and will make you seen as a bad editor. Andries 15:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Mao Zedong
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Mao Zedong, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

wrong editing behavior
Your behavior of creating new out articles taking out of the contents such asMao Zedong has no added value for Wikipedia as a whole. It decreases Wikipedia's maintainability. Please correct your edits immediately and start more constructive behavior. Thanks. Andries 17:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Links in U-boat articles
All of the broken and misformatted links you have added in U-boat articles have been reverted. In future, please preview pages before submitting changes. Thanks. --Ogdred 13:53, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Page Blanking
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to The Most. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! -- JLaTondre 17:23, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Deleting warnings from your Discussion Page
Hi, I just reverted a number of warnings that you deleted from your talk page. This is generally frowned upon. Thanks, Ogdred 22:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Campaignbox Indo-Pakistani War of 1965
A tag has been placed on Template:Campaignbox Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Battle of Chamb and Dogra for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Chamb and Dogra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Battle of Chamb and Dogra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Human 3015   TALK   22:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Double 'F'


The article Double 'F' has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable and unsourced"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)