User talk:Viktorpesenti

A tag has been placed on Bruce Dunlop & Associates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  16:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * First of all, keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a business directory or a provider of free web space. Articles need to maintain a neutral point of view and all facts therein should be referenced to independent, reliable sources.  Subjects of articles need to have a certain degree of notability--the guidelines for companies can be found here.  Finally, if you are connected with the company, you need to tread veeeeeery carefully to avoid the appearance of conflict of interest, and you should realize that others can come along and make changes, as is the case with every article here.


 * The original article as written looked like advertising/promotional material from the company itself, and such material is going to be tagged for a complete rewrite at best or speedily deleted as a copyright violation or as spam at worst. The fact that it was speedily deleted does not preclude its recreation, but the new article needs to be more closely aligned with Wikipedia's policies.  If you have any other questions, let me know.  Thanks. -- Finngall   talk  17:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC)