User talk:Viky2k

Welcome!
Hello, Viky2k, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Exigent Game Art, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mean as custard (talk) 12:19, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Exigent Game Art


A tag has been placed on Exigent Game Art requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Mean as custard (talk) 12:19, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Paid editing
Hello Viky2k. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Viky2k. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:19, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I am not being paid for promoting Exigent Game Art. I am promoting Gaming Industry in Delhi, India. Please don't delete my article. I am new to Wiki and thats why I was editing again and again. If that is a problem I will only edit it once. Hoping for cooperation from your side.
 * I don't understand. You are here for promotion, but you have no financial stake in it? You do not make money in the game industry, which is what you're promoting? (And I didn't ask if that financial stake was tied to Exigent Game Art; I asked if your edits were financially compensated in any way). To take care fo that issue you only need provide the disclosure. You will not be blocked for doing so. You can be blocked for not doing so, however, if your edits were related to financial compensation. I mean why would you have posted that commercial if you weren't? But, you also need to understand that Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion. As I indicate, article you posted was very promotional in tone and content, and making promotional edits can also result in a block as an "advertising only account". Threading the needle of being here to promote, but editing in a neutral manner, is a very hard line to walk, which is why we so strongly discourage people with a conflict of interest from editing. Very few people can do it successfully.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 09:07, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I just have one question. If my article is promotional in nature, then what about million of companies whose wiki page exists. Every wiki page of a company is also promotional in nature. Just let me know how is my article different than these two articles : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhruva_Interactive and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtuos
 * Hi again Viky2k. Please read WP:WAX. In short, we have lots of content that needs to be reviewed and rewritten or deleted. So this kind of argument is in the form: "Littering is illegal. I see lots of littering by people who were not caught littering, therefore I should be allowed to litter." But you also have to understand the distinction between articles on companies, and articles on companies with promotional tone to the wording and by what content is included. But the article you created though it had other problems, in that it did not demonstrate notability, was not deleted as promotional but as a copyright violation. Again, we have no policy that persons editing with a conflict of interest cannot write articles, we just strongly discourage it. We do have a mandatory policy, however, requiring disclosure of paid editing. I was simply explaining that most people who have a conflict of interest are not capable of writing a neutral article, not that you can't try.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:36, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

So now what do I do?? Can i edit my article to make it sound non-promotional. I am new to Wiki and I need your support to understand it better.
 * You cannot repost the draft with copyright violations in it! Again, the draft was deleted a a copyright violation and for no other reason. The rest was advice about the lay of the land. So yes, you can attempt another draft (let's not forget, after you provide disclosure, this all started with that, and I still haven't seen a satisfactory answer) – written entirely in your own words – but just keep in my what I've said about keeping it as neutrally written as possible, and be aware that it will never be accepted unless it demonstrates the notability of the topic.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:46, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Ok thanks for the advice.

Ways to improve Exigent3d‎
Hi, I've tagged your article Exigent3d‎ for improvements. First of all it's uncatagorized, see WP:CATEGORY and H:CAT for help on adding some. Second, it's a stub, that is to say very short. Please fill it out with more details, but make sure they're all backed up by reliable sources. Also, the one reference you do have isn't formatted correctly. See WP:REFBEGIN for help on that. Hope this helps you make the article better! JamesG5 (talk) 07:31, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Exigent3d


The article Exigent3d has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NCORP. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable secondary sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The1337gamer (talk) 09:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)