User talk:VilhelmSchofield


 * }

Speedy deletion nomination of William Andrew James Schofield


A tag has been placed on William Andrew James Schofield requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies.  FlowerpotmaN &middot;(t) 22:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jennifer Schofield


Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Prestonmag (talk) 22:12, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Grandad Bill


A tag has been placed on Grandad Bill requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Slon02 (talk) 22:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

"I believe normal people should have a chance to show their attributes"
They can. Try Facebook or MySpace... Peridon (talk) 22:26, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Well i tried but I got evicted from them as well. I love Wikipedia and spent days getting an account. If you could let me have these three pages that would mean more to me than you could imagine
 * I'm sorry that we can't. It's one of those things - your pages (except the stuff about your sisters) were well enough constructed but didn't meet the notability requirement. If we allowed just any pages, we'd be up to our ears in things proclaiming 'Shawn is aaawwwweeeeesssssoooommmmmeeeee!!!!!' (which he obviously isn't...). Stuff in articles about people must fit in with WP:BIO and be referenced with reliable sources WP:RS. Good luck when the exams come round - do get as many good passes as you can. You will probably think you will never use the stuff in them again, but I still remember things from mine and use them when editing here. Peridon (talk) 19:16, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Bill Slater appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:34, 26 April 2011 (UTC)