User talk:Vili.falenius

January 2020
Hello, I'm Hzh. Your recent edit(s) to the page Green Day discography appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hzh (talk) 12:55, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Green Day discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hzh (talk) 19:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Green Day discography. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hzh (talk) 21:17, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Green Day discography. Hzh (talk) 22:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

When i edited the green day discography my source was RIAA. RIAA is very reliable source. So if you just type RIAA on Google and go to their site. And then when you are In the page you press the search button and type green day. When it founds redult for green day you srcoll down and press on dookie. Then it will show you dookie's US sales. So just fucking type RIAA on Google and go see green day's dookie US album sales Vili.falenius (talk) 06:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Certification is not sales, it is shipment under the old system, now it is sales + streams + tracks. We put certification under the certification column, sales under sales column, they are two separate columns, so don't duplicate certification information in sales column. You need to source information for sales, and in the US it will be a source for SoundScan numbers, not RIAA certification. Hzh (talk) 13:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Ok. But why i cant ad green day's dookie US sales to Green Day discography? Dookie's US sales are 10,000,000 it is added to dookie's own Wikipedia site so why you wont let me put dookie's US sales to Green Day discography, if it is added to dookie's own Wikipedia site? Vili.falenius (talk) 14:06, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Because you did not add a source. US certification is for 10 million shipped, not sold. I can find another source and add it later. Hzh (talk) 15:04, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks Vili.falenius (talk) 16:43, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Green Day discography. Hzh (talk) 18:35, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Green Day discography. Hzh (talk) 02:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop adding that. It is not properly sourced, RIAA certification is not true sales, and the altpress one refers to RIAA certification, you can also not use Wikipedia pages as sources per WP:CIRCULAR. This has been repeatedly explained and you have been repeatedly warned about sourcing. There are enough final warnings. Hzh (talk) 22:26, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Diamond certification means that the album have sold over 10 million copies in the US alone Vili.falenius (talk) 12:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * It has been repeatedly explained to you by different people, certification is the not the same as sales. RIAA certification figures does not reflect SoundScan figure, the fact that you think they are the same suggest the you don't know what SoundScan numbers are (SoundScan is the official collator of sales figures). If you keep doing that and adding sales without sources (and the sources should be of SoundScan numbers. and RIAA), then we have to consider your edits disruptive. Hzh (talk) 21:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Green Day discography. Hzh (talk) 23:42, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Hzh (talk) 13:55, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Stop changing sales without proper sources
It has been explained to you numerous times, the sales figures is not in RIAA, and Chartmaster.org is a website that should be avoided, please read WP:CHARTS. It is not considered a reliable site. Hzh (talk) 01:01, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

In The site greenday.fm the sales are taken from the latest soundscan. It even said it in the Page. I no it's a fanpage, but does it matter if the numbers are taken from soundscan?? Vili.falenius (talk) 07:24, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * It doesn't say anything about Dookie's SoundScan sales. Fan sites are considered unreliable, and are not used. Hzh (talk) 10:01, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Hzh (talk) 02:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Continued use of bad sources for record sales
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. Any admin may lift this block if they become convinced that you will follow Wikipedia policy in the future. EdJohnston (talk) 01:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)