User talk:Vimal varun

July 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Mayawati. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 01:28, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Vimal varun. Your edit is being reversed, because it's a bad edit. You are changing the hatnote from "Mayavati redirects here" to "Mayawati redirects here". The problem is, the page called "Mayawati" is not a redirect. On Wikipedia, a "redirect" is a page that has no content itself but sends the reader to another page. The page "Mayawati" is where the content is! it is not a redirect. Please stop now. -- Diannaa (talk) 15:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Reported at edit warring notice board
I have reported you at the edit warring notice board: Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. You are welcome to comment there, or post a message here if you prefer. -- Diannaa (talk) 15:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I reverted the last edit and will block you if you continue edit-warring. You really should understand that your edit just breaks markup and does not introduce anything useful.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Vimal varun, the report at WP:ANI has been closed with a warning to you. The next time you revert on this article you are risking a block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24h for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:.
 * I am disappointed by the fact that you have chosen not to listen to anybody and not to communicate to anybody, but to continue reverting.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:05, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Advice
Hi new user, Welcome to Wikipedia, don't feel sad after getting warned by 3 admins, it happens with new user. But you should give edit summary also you can use talk pages to explain your edits so that your edits will not get reverted, otherwise changing "Mayawati Kumari' to "Kumari Mayawati" was good editing(and I know you were changing name of redirect because you thought "Mayavati" is spelling mistake in article). To know about "Edit summary", "Talk page" and "Redirect" you should take help of box above I posted, or you can ask questions on Teahouse/Questions. Teahouse is really nice place for new comers, it helped me a lot when I was new. Cheers. -- Human 3015  knock knock  • 23:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mayawati. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 07:23, 4 July 2015 (UTC)