User talk:Vimalraj Selvakumar

Replaceable fair use File:Jasminbhasin.png
Thanks for uploading File:Jasminbhasin.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 03:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Twinkle Taneja.png
Thanks for uploading File:Twinkle Taneja.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 17:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, Vimalraj Selvakumar. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:51, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Duplicate templates
Hi there, any reason why you created two (basically) duplicate templates? What's the difference between these? Why do we need both? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:56, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Template:Golden Petal Awards
 * Template:Colors Golden Petal Awards

Hi sir, I mistakenly created Template:Golden Petal Awards. Now I contest it for speedy deletion. Thank you. Vimalraj Selvakumar (talk) 21.02, 11 October 2017 (IST)

Block evasion
Why are you evading your block with this account? It's obvious. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  15:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Sir please forgive me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vimalraj Selvakumar (talk • contribs) 15:48, October 11, 2017 (UTC)
 * Vimalraj Selvakumar, what was the name of your original account? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You are continuing to edit but not answering this question, your editing privileges will be revoked soon. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  16:41, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for self confirmed block evasion, likely sock of Jaswanthvijay, advertising only. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  17:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 01:28, 12 October 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 12:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)


 * THis disruption of yours has gone on in three projects that I know of (I'm not familiar enough with Wikidata), and at ta.wiki, Commons and here, you've been independently blocked by different people for creating the same level of disruption. It is clear that you haven't a clue what an encylopaedia is and are stuffing articles here with your copyvios and advertorials. I don't think you should be unblocked. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  04:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)


 * And right after posting the above unblock notice, you created another sock -- . I'm not going to review this unblock request, but, if not done by someone else, I'll revoke your talk page access soon. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  10:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Respected Administrator, I did not create User:Ranji Weimali. It is the account of my brother, who shared my same IP address on hotspot. You blocked me from creating account. Then how could I create a new account? Please understand me. Thank you. Vimalraj Selvakumar (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)