User talk:VinLy

ok thanks. seems u are unfair. Its was just coincidence that it appeared like that. sorry for the inconvenience. I am a new user here. I only came to Schlumberger page. I wouldn't call it vandalism. I was putting valid citations of news that specified Schlumberger.


 * You are not blocked for vandalism. You are blocked because you are the sockpuppet of another editor. Hope this helps. Syrthiss (talk) 18:27, 21 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Please stop creating accounts to avoid your block, as you did with User:ArthurOleary. TN X Man  19:38, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

I am just asking you to see if my edits and citations warranted someone undoing it without reason??? whats the problem here? do u also work for Schlumberger?

And I think u should be asking yourself why those users are hell bent on the Schlumberger page as well when I did check and put valid citations. Are they all invalid citations? Why did they leave 2 of the edits there when originally they deleted all the edits I made?

see below!

THIS ONE IS LEFT ON PAGE BUT WAS PREVIOUSLY DELETED!! On December 2009 the state Department of Environmental Protection fined Chesapeake Appalachia LLC and Schlumberger Technology Corp. more than $15,500 each for a hydrochloric acid spill in February 2009 at Chesapeake's Chancellor natural gas well site in Asylum Twp., Bradford County.

Lawsuits
THIS ONE IS LEFT ON PAGE BUT WAS PREVIOUSLY DELETED!! Federal investigators say the subsidiary of Schlumberger Ltd. (NYSE:SLB) committed visa fraud 421 times between 2000 and 2004. WesternGeco has agreed to pay $19.6 million in fines and fees for submitting fraudulent visa applications for foreign workers aboard U.S.-owned ships in the Gulf of Mexico.

THE REMAINING BELOW NOT VALID?

Controversy
On May 19th Reuters ran a story about employees of Schlumberger leaving the rig of the Deepwater Horizon the very same day of the catastrophe.

Appointments
Jamie Gorelick was also a member of the board of Schlumberger N.V., but tendered her resignation on June 3, 2010 in connection with her law firm's representation of BP plc in connection with U.S. Congressional hearings related to the Deepwater Horizon incident.

I could easily log out and log into my service provider and get new IP and create new account with Wikipedia but I want my edits to be looked at seriously. Why were all my edit deleted at one stage? why at the end 2 of my edits out of the 4 edits left there? why were the last 2 edit deleted? whats the difference? they all had schlumberger in the news article? Am I wrong? Are those guys wrong? For all I know they work for Schlumberger. So seriously you need to ask them who their employer is and if they have a conflict of interest. Are they just monitoring Schlumberger related pages as I see some of your admins work in oil industry. Boris G works in oil and possibly one of the other guys I have visited his page here in Wikipedia.

ok thanks. seems u are unfair. Its was just coincidence that it appeared like I logged on at same time as other user. Like I said this is a shared IP address for the whole of Malaysia (25 million people. out of that possibly 1 million are using Digi communication broadband. So u want to ban the 1 million people?. sorry for the inconvenience. I am a new user here. I only came to Schlumberger page. I wouldn't call it vandalism. I was putting valid citations of news that specified Schlumberger.