User talk:Vinay Jayanth

any reason why its a false criticism ?


 * The link provided by you as a reference for criticism is not a credible link as mere emails cannot be considered as reliable sources for posting information.Similarly,the reference link that was provided earlier for this article was just a blog created by a person.It cannot be considered as a reliable source of information.For example, if a person writes that another person is a criminal does not prove that he/she is a criminal actually.You need to provide a reliable reference link to post any kind of information. --Vinay Jayanth (talk) 11:05, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, I'm Jay-Sebastos. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Relief India Trust with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jay Σεβαστός discuss  11:07, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

March 30 2015
Hello Vinaya,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DChinu (talk • contribs) 13:52, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

I agree the reference are questionable but the truth is the whole article is a written like a advert and most probably by the said organization or paid authoring by the authors who are known to abuse the system and blocked indefinitely.

Page Creator  : User:Shevakumaran  -  This account has been blocked indefinitely because CheckUser evidence confirms that the operator has abusively used multiple accounts.

Mjr. Cont     : User:Sneha.M15     -   This account has been confirmed by a Checkuser as a sock puppet of Writer media (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.









These are the sock puppeteers who wrote this article which misleads and helps the organization continue its malpractice in the field by the help of wikipedia. Current major contributors Shobhit.v87 and Kakkerifair are most probably same persons/organization carrying out the same abuse.

'''I would most probably include you in the same pool of people who wrote this and profiting from this malpractice.

As for me i raised the criticism as i faced the same alleged malpractice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DChinu (talk • contribs) 13:46, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

April 1 2015
I do not know who the above users who have been blocked are.Being a wikipedia user,all I know is that as per the policy of wikipedia, references from discussion forums and blogs cannot be used to publish any kind of information on wikipedia.We all should respect the policies of wikipedia and post only reliable information on the internet. --Vinay Jayanth (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

April 1 2015
Hello, If we adhere to that rule than the following linked portion of the article which being referred by these external references would also ought to be removed References 8,9 and 10 links to a local advertising site http://www.vivastreet.co.in/ which are straight out forgery

References 13 links to a similar local classified site http://www.buildersghar.com/

Reference 15 leads to another expired/setup website reliefindiatrustngo.com

Reference 6 leads to Medium.com which is a user posted content (Medium is a blog-publishing platform) Reference 5 leads to the website of the said organization http://www.reliefindiatrust.org/mission.php

Hope you would help to make this article more accurate by the following information.