User talk:Vinayrajput2015

Welcome!
Hello, Vinayrajput2015, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Lodhi have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Sitush (talk) 11:36, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lodhi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Not only are you adding unsourced material, but you're removing sourced material. If you really feel there are problems with the presentation of the article, then raise your concerns at Talk:Lodhi—and you must provide reliable sources for the changes you want to make.'' —C.Fred (talk) 11:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lodhi. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 11:50, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lodhi. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Lodhi was changed by Vinayrajput2015 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871374 on 2018-05-03T11:52:44+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:52, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Lodhi. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 11:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 11:54, 3 May 2018 (UTC)


 * It is unacceptable to abuse multiple accounts, especially while blocked. I am extending your block an additional 24 hours because of this abuse. The general rule is one account, one person. I strongly suggest that you make no further attempts to create new accounts or in any way attempt to use another user's account while blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 15:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC)