User talk:Vincas1984/sandbox

Vincas1984 (talk) 12:48, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Dear Sir or Madam,

my recent entry on jewellery artist Vita Pukštaitė-Bružė has been declined: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vincas1984/sandbox The reviewer left a comment: I can't check on the sources but right now please avoid using adjectives which makes it look promotional.

After reading the comment, I have checked the text for unnecessary adjectives. I have found a couple but no more which could be deleted without harming the harmony of analysis. Reviewing this article is important to have in mind that there is an entry on art jewellery. Those adjectives are used in a part where the style of an artist is analysed. There are no adjectives at all only pure facts in other parts of the article. The part where the style of the artist is analysed is based on eight different sources. Yes, they are in Lithuanian but using Google translate one could easily check how accurately I have used those sources. Also, only one of the used sources is created by the artist himself - taken from her personal website. Other sources are from media, exhibitions catalogues or reviews of art jewellery experts. I want to state clearly by writing this that the analysis refers to a range of independent, reliable, and published sources. Discussion about objectivity in the analysis of art style is a question of standpoint itself and could not be a reasonable argument to say that somebody is subjective. One has to analyse these objects himself and to say what was said inaccurate or wrong about them.

Kind regards Vincas1984